Survey... People Who Identify as Left-Wing More Likely to Have Been Diagnosed With a Mental Illness

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Scataphagos, Feb 12, 2020.

  1. %%
    LOL;
    no noise
     
    #11     Feb 12, 2020
  2. Overnight

    Overnight

     
    #12     Feb 12, 2020
    murray t turtle likes this.
  3. %% With all due respec, Overnitet;
    i like Jones Motors+ Paul Tudor Jones, much more..............................................................................................
     
    #13     Feb 12, 2020
  4. gaussian

    gaussian


    I know this might be big brain but infowars isn't exactly a reliable source of scientifically reviewed opinions. Being run by the seconded biggest giver of the hottest takes, Alex Jones, it's important to step back and realize that if Jones doesn't convince you baby eating reptiles are going to eat you too unless you buy his supplements, he isn't doing his job.

    Moreover, Slate Star Codex has not had this study peer reviewed so it may as well say voting for Trump grants super powers. It's just as valid.

    I wish people would learn to read academic papers. Maybe then they'd realize a "study" carried out by a website that isn't peer reviewed and repeated (especially in the area of psychology - repeatability is huge) by someone without a PhD and a verified journal publishing record in the field is worth less than the paper it's written on. We can likely find significant mental illness among the far right by choosing N such that it fits our agenda.

    There's no controls in the study especially around ideological acceptance - for example how did they control for the fact mental illness is acceptable on the left (and therefore more openly spoken about) vs. the right (who is more likely to hide it)? A person on the left may be more inclined to admit they have mental illness (or perhaps fake it for SJW points) than someone on the right who would be ashamed by it. How did they verify these people indeed had their "diagnosed" mental illness? How did they verify their N was truly random? These are just three of the many shortcomings of this trash heap of a survey.

    They did a GOOGLE DOC SURVEY for fuck's sake. There's more science in the last shit I took than this study.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2020
    #14     Feb 12, 2020
    Tony Stark and Bugenhagen like this.
  5. jem

    jem

    I would like to see this study control for almost daily exercise.





     
    #15     Feb 12, 2020
  6. Bugenhagen

    Bugenhagen

    I'm fairly sure it was to avoid horrible daily exercise the smart people in our hunter-gatherer past invented houses & civilization and shit.
     
    #16     Feb 13, 2020
  7. #17     Feb 13, 2020
  8. Just another stable genius in our midst.
     
    #18     Feb 13, 2020
  9. jem

    jem

    silly response...
    hunter gathers spread out to fish and learn agriculture.
    once they found consistent sources of food they settled down. (most likely)

    been to mensa groups 20 years ago.
    a few of the members were in good shape
    many looked like jeff bezos before he got smart and got a trainer.
    There are reasons so many tech ceos got in shape.
    they read the studies.

    many recent studies show the massive importance of filling you body with oxygen, endorphins and the myraid other benefits which exercise gives your brain and your body. Similarly there are even studies which show the similar importance of frequent sex (especially for women).

    So my theory is that a couple decades ago... many high IQ types were no into exercise at all. Now they are playing the price.

    Obviously its just a theory. But, it sure seems to fit many of the the Mensa types I know, knew or met. Think pocket protectors types 20 years ago.
     
    #19     Feb 13, 2020
  10. fuck mensa, you need to look into joining an English club.
    [​IMG]
     
    #20     Feb 13, 2020
    Frederick Foresight likes this.