The first one is about Obama's pick for the secretary of Labor Hilda Solis. http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2009/02/another_cabinet.html The second is about Leon Panetta the man Obama has picked to head the CIA. http://www.nypost.com/seven/02052009/news/politics/quesions_over_panettas_700k_in_fees_153687.htm I think it is safe to say the American people are and about Obama right now. I am guessing the average of the next 3-4 polls on Obama will be somewhere in the mid 50's.
I think it's funny how everyone said during that election that all of his past associations did not mean anything, that we need to look at what he will do, not at who he has been friends with etc etc. Well, we are now seeing based upon the "quality" of the individuals he is nominating to key positions of power that purhaps those pas associations actually are meaningful.
Yes We Can (appoint tax cheats and criminals into office)!!!! Is this the CHANGE 42% of white voters and 99.99999999% of black voters were promised? Stupid asswipes voted for a "community activist" who didn't have the experience to be mayor of Chicago let alone POTUS. The only "history" he's making is two weeks of bad judgement, awful policies, and criminal appointies. 3 years and 50 weeks left.
What a clever way to clean house. No muss, no fuss. Just nominate and let the nominees fail on their own accord. Hey, kudos to Obama for opening up the books on Bill Clinton donors.
The fact that Bill Ayers and Obama have been tightly associated in the past gives me and everyone who can think logically all the reasons in the world to understand why Obama's picks are corrupt. The bottom line is that Obama is attracted to people who are corrupt.