I have tons of losses over the years. I am not ashamed of these. All speculators have losses. Why do they bother you so much? There is zero upside for me to show you anything. You are an anonymous Internet alias who writes like a more cogent jack Hershey or any number of "traders world" magazine article writers. You are far from unique with the parroted language. surf
You seem to be bothered that I am replying to you when you mentioned me by name and issued your TA challenge. How you get the notion that my reply means I am bothered is beyond me. I thought it was courteous of me to answer your request. Of course you have losses. All of us do... except Jack. But you are a bit perfidious when it comes to saying what your losses are so it is easy to boast of how great PD's are. In fact seems like you are ashamed of your losses. You keep trying to personalize this and deflect the trading conversation to other silly points and go below the belt - but if I did likewise to you, you'd come on all hurt and go on about being attacked. Who cares if I am unique? Please show evidence of who I am parroting. However I would prefer if we discussed trading and kept to performance as that is the subject matter of interest. As for upside, I thought this thread was about you showing your PD's in action and putting down TA and traders who use TA and those who have anything to do with TA. When someone posts asking how to learn TA you post to forget it as it is a waste of time. The upside would be you get to prove your point that you believe to be true. Let's see how deep that belief really runs surf
Sorry, I thought you said I was not unique? I'm confused. Am I parroting others and I'm not unique... or have you never heard anyone speak in my language?
Dave, this is low even for you. The guy has been polite in his challenges to you and you put him on ignore because he rattled your cage? Your skin is way too thin.
Context spurt context. Of real profitable traders, I have never heard anyone speak like you or issue challenges. Among marketers authors and other of that ilk, your methods Are quite common---welcome to ignore.
Ah ha, I'm the clown and I'm on ignore... once again? I think the thread had a wee logic burp there. Did I read something about you using aliases and talking to yourself on your own threads and getting banned from ET? Hmm, interesting. So there you have it folks, surf is down the memory hole again. Oh and on the Dow - it's called a spring
Not at all. You guys know who I am, I have no clue who I am talking to. If refuses to reveal his identity, I want nothing to do with him on the surf report. Spurt has gotten enough free publicity for his alias from me and the surf report readers. He can start his own journal now. He is not welcomed here and adds zero value. surf
Please, let's not rewrite history as if I was challenging you in the first instance. I am not issuing the challenge - I am replying to your challenge to prove TA against your PD's. On a completely different matter that seems important to you, please show the methods I am using being used by others as I am confused as to what you mean, but an example will no doubt clarify.
Quote from Xspurt: All in - no scaling in or out - ever. No changing of potion sizes either. Why not?