I am an expert in TA, ex MTA member, charted by hand pre-PC, and have published multiple articles on the subject--- what makes you think I don't understand?? Just like the professor who is an expert in myths-- doesn't mean he "believes" in them. BUT Yes, i agree with your second sentence.
Experts usually have success in their field. I'm not convinced you are an expert in TA. Perhaps you've been around TA or studied TA for a long time? Expert seems like a stretch
Surf, I'm posting this reply here as I don't want to derail MAESTROs thread further: It's you who stated that markets are "pseudo random", I simply pointed out that a "pseudo random" series of events is totally predictable from a mathematical point of view (it comes with the definition of "pseudo"): Pseudorandom sequences typically exhibit statistical randomness while being generated by an entirely deterministic causal process.
Yes, but because you do not know the inputs of the deterministic causal process, it remains unpredictable. right? surf