Surf's Special Situation Journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by marketsurfer, Aug 4, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Would any of The market timing maestros care to make specific, real time, before the fact calls here or on their own journal? Otherwise it's all gibberish, hubris, and zero value add surf:D
     
    #2421     Feb 7, 2013
  2. Uh, yeah, Cornix did that over 50 times, verified by a third party, to which you ignored repeatedly. Or have you forgotten this already.


     
    #2422     Feb 7, 2013
  3. I just like increased ranges, I'll take trend or sideways action, just as long as the ranges open up some. :D

     
    #2423     Feb 7, 2013
  4. That's old news, man. Back in 2004, I called the exact closing price of the DJIA several times in a row on the surf report--- big deal-- it was pure luck. Let's see the skills now-- no more glory day nonsense.
     
    #2424     Feb 7, 2013
  5. I'll ask again due to the bogus answers and cop outs from the maestros.

    surf:D
     
    #2425     Feb 7, 2013
  6. Another very solid point. But also a point for noobs to be wary of because the last thing a noob needs is more leverage to go with an unproven method. But, it's nice to know that when the time comes and the skills are more advanced that that leverage can be used effectively intraday to exploit the gyrations.

     
    #2426     Feb 7, 2013
  7. The maestro speaks yet says nothing different than in a dozen common trading books.

    Step up to the plate, enough hubris, make a few calls. You have already told us that you are not a scalper so make a few calls---- but it's very obvious the claims are bogus -- perhaps from a bored housewife with too much time....definitely not from a real market practitioner as the material parotted is too generic

    PS-- exploiting gyrations?! LMFAO! I heard that before someplace--- you are busted!
     
    #2427     Feb 7, 2013
  8. But Surf, you say these other people say nothing, but what is it that you say?

    You speak of Price Drivers, but you do not say what they are.

    You ask others to reveal their TA, and the way they trade, so it can be tested.

    Yet you do not reveal yours, so that it can be tested. This last trade of yours was a stopped clock trade. Everyone who was in the market made money over the last couple of weeks.

    You spoke of an uber bull, then you spoke of a bear, and now you are flat. If I did not know any better you are reading some rendition of a stochastics indicator.

    Your hit rate is not any better than someone picking a price point on their favorite indicator and pulling the trigger.

    You are clearly selling something. What is it?
     
    #2428     Feb 7, 2013


  9. [​IMG]
     
    #2429     Feb 7, 2013
  10. Eyez

    Eyez

    I honestly do not understand the arguments here.

    If using regression line is considered TA, and standard deviation on bollinger bands is considered TA, then in effect(ie. transitive property), math = TA

    A trendline is also TA, as 2-points in space is a basic algebra problem. (a line, or a ray)


    So, if math is TA, what is not TA? Did you use any kind of math to derive "price drivers" ?-- if so, you are using TA -- and thus, you don't believe in yourself.
     
    #2430     Feb 7, 2013
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.