I feel like the OP just argues for the sake of arguing sometimes. He doesn't really want any proof that TA can be objective and can be coded.
What does this answer have to do with anything? I'm asking if you know EVERY SINGLE trader out there that has a coded algo running based on TA? Meaning every coded system using TA has been revealed to you and you can say, with 100% certainty, that there is not a viable algo out there using TA.
The answer has to do with the your question. Your same reasoning is applied by UFO and bigfoot believers--- How do you know they "don't" exist?? There is no evidence of TA even being defined in a testable format, let alone evidence of some lone, mad scientist type cracking the market code via TA in his mother's basement. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE..... I contend that an objective, working TA system does not exist based on the lack of evidence. Could it exist, clearly it could exist, but so could bigfoot. It's MUCH more likely that folks are using intuition and subjective reasoning to make TA work. WHY is this so hard to comprehend? chart based TA is an art not a science. surf
Proving this to you would require revealing my system rule set/code and, as much as I'd like to see you eat crow, that pales in comparison to keeping that code-able ruleset away from prying eyes. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. My trading is far more important to me than proving a point.
This is a classic cop out. No friend, I am not asking for your system, nor do I care-- NOT ONE investor I know would invest in ANYTHING obviously TA related, so I don't have any interest. Just reveal one small part, enough to prove my premise wrong such as one repeatable testable pattern in the stock market. thanks surf