No claims, just reality, Surf. Supported with life proofs. If you don't see it, that's your problem, good luck with price drivers then.
Why do you keep denying reality, Surf? I indeed showed you 50+ trades live track record, all real-time, all 3rd party verified. Out of those 50+ trades done over the course of a couple of months most days were profitable and it's not just a lucky coincidence. Did countless amount of live trades in front of other people, many of whom are years old members of ET from different areas of the world. NoDoji did pretty much the same I believe. We do it to show people that successful trading is possible for anyone who really is ready to deliberately learn this craft. What scares you so much about this fact? I seriously care.
Cherry picked wining trades as evidence, 50 none the less? you can't really think this is acceptable, do you?? maybe to your clients who are desperate to make $$ so they will suspend their disbelief to sign up with the rarely lose psychologist to guide them to riches. LOL Trading is possible and many folks make money doing it. Why would you think I believe otherwise? Using charts and price action- combined with claims of rarely losing is another thing altogether, however. Your method is fatally flawed so you have designed a fantasy world of rarely losing to compensate. EVERY successful trader I know has FAR MORE LOSING DAYS than winning days. The Wins are much larger than the multiple losses equaling profits overall. Anyone who claims otherwise is naive, trying to build a reputation among the noobs, or selling snake oil. which is it? Folks here are too sophisticated to believe your schtck and if they do they are likely selling hope also, surf
You've seen my track record of valid sample size (I started it specially upon your critical request, remember ). What was there, was there. No deductions, no additions. The only question is: why you keep denying this fact of life? If you don't know traders who have more profitable days, well... just means you don't know them... doesn't reflect the whole reality of trading world in any way, only reflects your personal experience.
They weren't cherry picked. It was 50+ (56 if I remember right) in the row, tracked by independent 3rd party. Impossible to cherry pick, impossible to fake the profit factor around 2.0, gross profit exceeding gross draw-down by a few times and majority of profitable days. Why do you keep denying the obvious, that's a very interesting phenomenon for me, seriously. P. S. More so, those trades were replicated on the account of one of my friends, too. How do you think, could I cherry pick trades on HIS account?
50 is a valid sample size??? cherry picked-- as you likely had multiple accounts-- but with such a small sample that would not have been needed-- lucky streak could easily account for the success. surf
According to CLT 30+ is a valid sample size to see if event is likely random or not. Do you want to argue with theory of probability now?