Does anyone want to bet me that when (and it is not an IF its a WHEN) the Dow takes out the highs, that surfer will just stay in anyway, because that is what his mythical Price Driver system tells him to do??? Please note: the Price Driver system is all in his head and not an actual system. Further note: this is all a paper trade anyway and no actual capital is being risked.
Completely false. Go start your own journal and add value rather than being a troll. You haven't a clue yet you keep on talking. Jealousy must suck.
Jealousy seems to be your new buzzword, but in reality nobody has anything to be jealous about yet. Your Price Drivers are a work in progress. Did not work with Crude and Gold, may or may not work with YM, and even if they do one swallow does not make a summer. You need to take a longer term view, like Cornix.
No offense, but wtf? While I do agree, PD's are a work in progress, they have been uncannily accurate this year for macro calls. Here are examples--- Price drivers called the super bull in 2013 back in December, they called the end of the 2013 bull run and the subsequent steep decline and presently they have nailed the yearly top tic in the DJIA to the exact number--- Regarding gold-- on April 29 price drivers forecasted it would drop to below 1200 priohttp://tinyurl.com/Goldcallsurfr to bouncing higher. It did exactly this so far and we are waiting for it to continue higher to someplace higher than 1400 prior to another substantial downwave. In other words, the Price Drivers have been uncannily accurate. Have I traded every move to the ultimate win? No--- But that's my trading, not the calls. The calls provide the outline, how you trade them is up to you. surf
So, now you say do not look at what I do, look at what I say. Fine. You have called the top ticK of the DJIA for 2013 when it is proven to be such, ie the year is done. Until then it is unproven so stop bragging. Further, since you have consistently rubbished TA on the grounds it is not statistically verifiable, I trust you will agree that even getting the DJIA call right does not qualify the PDs as statistically verifiable. Would you like to go on the record as to what you believe will qualify the PDs as being statistically verifiable/proven? I think we should agree that point, don't you? Let's be consistent and not try to have it both ways. I know that is something you struggle with, judging from the other thread you just started.