Supreme court upholds voter ID law, disenfranchising native Americans in ND

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Cuddles, Oct 13, 2018.

  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    So in other news a fact-free leftist fringe website full of liberal narrative that ignores the actual facts. Go it.
     
    #21     Oct 14, 2018
  2. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    Beats unsubstantiated opinions on a forum w/no sources whatsoever.
     
    #22     Oct 14, 2018
  3. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Why don't you go to primary sources like the U.S. Census site to get real facts instead of relying on fringe narrative sites.
     
    #23     Oct 14, 2018
  4. Cuddles

    Cuddles

     
    #24     Oct 14, 2018

  5. Yup, you properly cited Ginsburg's dissent with which Kagan agreed.

    But there are no reliable swing votes now, and the conservatives/moderates are in the majority.

    SO START GETTING USED TO CITING MINORITY OPINIONS, for what they are worth.

    Elections have consequences. Oh, and not to forget that it is not all about the Supreme Court Trump and Mitch have put about 80 lower court judges in place and probably another 50 coming. in that range anyway. So a lot more lower court decisions will not even reach the supreme court.

    On the plus side. Heidi Hietcamp is going to lose by a fairly large amount in North Dakota such that the native vote would not have been able to save her. So those who dont like the way the courts ruled on this may still be disappointed but I dont think Heidi is going to be able to do the Hillary routine where she argues that she was cheated out of a victory.
     
    #25     Oct 14, 2018
  6. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    No one said anything about having to own land. Making sure someone is a citizen and who they say they are is the whole point of having identification.

    The rest of your statement is completely hyperbolic.
     
    #26     Oct 15, 2018
    FriskyCat, DTB2, Poindexter and 2 others like this.
  7. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    Yes it's hyperbole except they're demanding a "valid address" to vote which goes beyond simple identification.
     
    #27     Oct 15, 2018
  8. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    A valid address isn't being a property owner, just so we're clear. If you want to go after the valid address issue, which I am not informed enough to say is or is not an issue, at least be honest about the facts.
     
    #28     Oct 15, 2018
  9. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    That's not how hyperbole works
     
    #29     Oct 15, 2018
    Tsing Tao likes this.
  10. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    So if the guys do not build to code, they don't get an address, and if they want to vote, they risk their household getting condemned? Gotta hand it to these cons, their cruelty has no bounds.

    https://www.co.ward.nd.us/453/911-Coordinator

    Request for 911 Address:

    If you are requesting a new 911 address, they are issued in conjunction with the building permit. Please visit the Ward County Building Inspection Department for an application.
     
    #30     Oct 15, 2018
    Frederick Foresight likes this.