Nothing in those statements was a lie. Nothing in those statements contradicts their (expected) ruling in the Dobbs case.
Turtle Faced Moscow Mitch....... ''a national ban is possible''.......... Fuck woman's freedoms , 'From states rights to no rights': Shock after McConnell explains next steps if GOP wins the midterms With all eyes on the expected Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade will impact the 2022 midterm elections, GOP Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) offered his thoughts on what could happen in January if Republicans win back the Senate. "Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is similarly reluctant to discuss the issue, calling it premature, but said a national abortion ban is possible if the Supreme Court overturns Roe," USA Today reported Saturday. The newspaper interviewed McConnell following a lead to Politico of an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito which would end the right to abortion across America. "It would depend on where the votes were," McConnell said of a vote for a national ban. But McConnell seemed to hint it would occur. "With regard to the abortion issue, I think it's pretty clear where Senate Republicans stand," McConnell explained. "And if and when the court makes a final decision, I expect everybody will be more definitive. But I don't think it's much secret where Senator Republicans stand on that issue." "McConnell told the National Right to Life conference in 2014, that if elected majority leader after the election, he'd push thru legislation limiting a woman's right to have an abortion. Instead he got us a 6-3 Court. Now a national ban is in his sights."
A "national abortion ban" would have to be passed by 60 senators. That will never happen. Just like a national pro-abortion law will not be passed by 60 senators. All hail the filibuster.
After the U.S. Supreme Court overturns women’s constitutional right to abortion this summer, Arizona U.S. Senate candidate Blake Master (R) thinks judges should also take aim at the right to buy and use contraception, the Arizona Mirror reports. And where is the unborn here to virtue signal? Or is it just about sex?
Supreme Court does not initiate the cases. Ever. The case has to come through the system, and usually several appellate courts have to rule differently on the case. Has there been a state law instituted and appealed forbidding buying and using contraception recently? Like in the last couple decades? Can you cite one?
So this is the asshole who prevented Obama from naming a Supreme Court judge in his last year office but then we saw Republicans push through a nomination in the waning weeks of Trumps term ? These guys are corrupt, and try to slither into office then do not act on what the actual majority wants. Americans are so easily conned then they complain when it doesn't work out for them. We don't need universal health care blah blah blah .... oh, why are my medical bills so expensive. Packing the Supreme Court with extremist conservatives is not a problem they'd never repeat RvW ... oh, it's going to be repealed and we are now discussing a nationwide ban on abortion. You let a man Trump with failed marriages and numerous sexual assault cases have influence on women's rights in your country. That's totally fucked, but it's America these days.
It's not just one or two extremist nuts in the Republican party, There is a whole load of them the party attracts them these days. And because you have a ridiculous two party system they can often get elected regardless.