Supreme Court Rules On Insider Trading For First Time In 20 Years: Why It Matters

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by Banjo, Dec 6, 2016.

  1. Banjo

    Banjo

    TraDaToR likes this.
  2. dealmaker

    dealmaker

    I love this decision! This is good for trading, I expect this puts the cap on loop holes. I hope that mother ( Bassam Salman) rots in jail...
     
  3. sprstpd

    sprstpd

    Here is a counterargument. As a trader, it seems like you would want more insider trading because then chart/tape reading becomes more informative.
     
    VPhantom likes this.
  4. dealmaker

    dealmaker

    No! Because if there are no rules there is chaos. Ideally as a trader you want price to be efficient IE price to reflect the news, in insider trading price moves without the news thus its a gamble....
     
  5. Amalgam

    Amalgam

    "Insider trading" is legal for futures though...
     
  6. dealmaker

    dealmaker

    VPhantom and TraDaToR like this.
  7. Amalgam

    Amalgam

    VPhantom and dealmaker like this.
  8. RRY16

    RRY16

    Pretty soon they're going to have safe zones for traders because price isn't reflecting the news....what a crock!
     
  9. dealmaker

    dealmaker

    It has to be even playing field...Have you ever traded OPG, if you have then you know what I am saying...
     
  10. RRY16

    RRY16

    Yea I did back in the 90's and insider trading was rampant back then except it wasn't called insider trading.
     
    #10     Dec 6, 2016