oh i delivered on all fronts.. in SPADES! you proved yourself unworthy of any more of my time or attention. you got your nuts squashed here.. and obliterated on diet thread at my hand.. bad day for ya axemonkey eh haha
Listen up you delusional little piece of shit You got your ass handed to you AGAIN. I objectively PROVED youre full of it. Further.... ET needs to take the garbage out. You dont even trade.... you blew up your little 10K account! ROFLAMOOOOOOOOOO Get lost poser..... your low IQ is dragging the ET average waaaay down BWAAAA HAAA HAAAAAAA!!!!!! How many MORE of my bets are you gonna run away from chicken little? peace axeman
Lookout ArchAngel...you have ETs biggest poser moron agreeing with you, longshot. Always a bad sign peace axeman
Axe, you're being argumentive and illogical.(though I respect your intellect) The Supreme Court did not DUCK the issue. Your choice of verbiage is disingenuous.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=000&invol=02-1624 they clearly ducked it - they based the lack of standing on custody claims on the child that arose after the suit was filed. do you really think a custody claim was the reason the case made it to the supreme court? LOL. the sup. ct. reaches a decision, then plays with whatever precedent is available to support it - its entirely political. there's enough variability in the case law to justify anything, if they want to. If the parents had been in reversed positions, they would've argued that a non-custodial parent retains rights nonetheless. they were looking for an easy way to put this away. this is a low-profile, politically-correct way to clear up some controversy, for the time being anyway. as to why... take a guess.
The word "duck" is not mine. Im using the american atheists quoted verbiage in case you didnt notice. My position is that the CORE issue was NOT addressed. Period. There was NO ruling on the separation of church and state issue which is what this case is REALLY all about. Not Newdows custody issues. Wether or not there was some conspiracy by the supreme court to avoid the issue on purpose is a different matter. peace axeman
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHAHA.. HERE HE GOES AGAIN.. "WELL I WEALLY WEALLY DINT MEAN DUCK, NOT MY WORDS..BLAH BLAH BLAH..." BWHAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAA!! DODGE HEDGE DODGE HEDGE DODGE HEDGE DODGE HEDGE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE WHAT A PIECE OF WORK. SEE ME EXPOSE THIS POSER FURTHER ON DIET THREAD!!