Interesting. A pro Bush thread (started more than a day and a half ago) seeking positive Bush comments generates four pages of anti Bush sentiment. The OP asks for any positive comments and the best (only) positive one was a weak generalized support of Bush (honestly, there are too many and it would take all day...very thankful for Bush, Cheney for 8 years!!! ) No specificity at all. I admit I think he is a dangerous POS and I have since the middle of his first term. Still, there has almost always been some do or die, stay the course, support our Commander in Chief at all costs, let's kick arse and nuke 'em all knuckleheaded know it alls out there... Their current silence is deafening and speaks volumes. Peace and gtty, Lar
typical.... the idiot psuedo-historian wants to write history before its even history.... This is why Today's democrats are so laughed at, and despised. Let me ask you... how has history treated the guy who got us into Vietnam?
.... this is really the only the question i'm left wondering about : Let me ask you... how has history treated the guy who got us into Vietnam?
Well 90% of ET's chit chat residents support the president. Just ask Patersb, AAA and Haroaki. My guess is they're all the same individual.
How will Bush be viewed after his presidency??? Can't be better than how he is viewed DURING his presidency... There are many more reasons why Bush is clearly the most incompetent president this country has ever seen. For example... Lately, there have been a series of articles on parents who reject vaccination for their kids due to the mercury content. Funny how all this goes back to Bush in one way or another... Bush opposed and vetoed a bill passed by Congress which would have given healthcare benefits and plans to children of low-income families who needed them. It would have been funded by an increase in the cigarette tax. Moreover, "without the usual television cameras, what the press avoids to mention in their reporting of the event, however, is that the bill contained an important passage that would have mandated the elimination of toxic mercury (the second most toxic metal known to man behind Uranium) from flu vaccines, a development sharply opposed by pharmaceutical companies." However, prior to vetoing the bill, President Bush had recieved sage and learned counsel advocating hope for the 'controversial' innocent: "Under the current administration, mercury has been and will continue to be knowingly injected into the youngest of American citizens. The controversial mercury-containing preservative thimerosal has been linked by thousands of parents as being the cause of their children's mercury poisoning and autism." "The flu vaccine, which continues to be manufactured with mercury, is recommended for all pregnant women, infants and children despite the fact that the Institute of Medicine in 2001 recommended against the policy of exposing these same sensitive groups to thimerosal containing vaccines." http://www.healthy.net/scr/news.asp?Id=9434 So some groups argue there is no link to mercury in vaccines and illnesses such as autism. Last I checked, I can't eat fish as much as I'd like because of the mercury content. Maybe Big Pharma uses a "different" type of mercury. Once again Bush...you and your administration have proved yourselves useless and a detriment to society.
The only thing I can think of that benefitted all Americans from this admin. was Do Not Call. Wish they'd included junk FAXes though.
and not that bush had anything to do with it, but the ny state do not call list was more effective than the national one. spitzer went after the do not callers... (and junk faxing is illegal, and has been, for a while now.)