Superfocus glasses

Busted again by our Royal Mounted Canadian grammar/spelling police.
As he rides to the rescue of spelling and grammar sitting atop his high horse.

 

I didn't even get to your spelling or grammar. I was only referring to your sentence structure, which didn't quite meet elementary school standards.

Thanks for ruining this thread, although I can't say I didn't help.

 

Sentence structure isn't part of grammar up in Canada, eh?

:eek:

 

http://www.putlearningfirst.com/language/06senten/06senten.html

A sentence can be grammatically correct but awkwardly written. If you can't make the distinction then try to stay within your depth.

 

http://www.pixeloptics.com/empower/index.html

 

Anything to avoid admitting being wrong eh Thinderpussy?

 

Interesting alternative. Thanks for the link. But I note that the technology is still "window in window" when activated, which is what Superfocus tries to get away from. Fortunately, I'm still not at the point where I need either of these, as they hammer out who's who.

 

By posting, you remove all doubt.

 

I hear glass breaking - again.

 

Next time there's a severe snowstorm with sub-zero wind chill, why don't you make that walk?