LOL. If you read what the paper discovered instead of reading line 1 and drawing your stupid conclusions-maybe you would understand how science works.
So science works by ignoring the first sentence of a scientific paper YOU LINKED?? So I should totally ignore that line in the paper saying Covid causes worse outcomes than the vaccines and that will help your argument how? LOL?
You can read it all you want. But the data the study confirms is not that. At all. At all. That’s why they do the study. You just have to read it. Yer so stupid you don’t even know what you are looking for or what you are asking for. You asked for a paper. Specifically: a scientific paper that shows vaccines causes more heart issues than the virus itself. there’s one. One of many.
I read it, the first line says the study noted that the risk for these conditions is significantly lower than the health risks seen in patients with COVID-19 Explain to us all what that line means. You are now claiming data doesnt confirm it, then why is that the first line of the study? Why should I look for something specific in a paper instead of reading it as a whole? You want me to cherry pick a scientific paper and that is not stupid? You are welcome to post other papers, did I force you to post this paper?
Why read the first line? Just read the headline: Higher Incidence of Myocarditis, Pericarditis Found After COVID-19 Vaccination done. Why do I need to keep doing homework for you to show you how shitty your vaccine is?
What? You base your science on headlines? You didn't even read the first line, let alone the paper you linked? LMFAO MUCH Higher Incidence of Myocarditis, Pericarditis Found After COVID-19 Why leave that out? Cherry picking is homework now? Mr.Science reads only headlines and ignores the actual scientific paper. Thanks for clowning yourself in public, this post is for the ET history books. Your inbred logic is exposed, there is no going back now, 'pureblood'.
Thanks for confirming what you didn’t know. That the vaccines cause more heart damage than COVID. Just read the papers and you will find out. Well done!! “the meta-analysis results suggesting a higher risk of myocarditis or pericarditis with COVID-19 vaccination” Enjoy your VAIDS
This is a complete and brazen lie, you think this is some boomer FB group where you can just lie like that and get away? Show me one paper where it says that, just one of the many that you have 'read'. LOL, can you even fucking read, pureblood inbred?
Already posted 2. Too bad you don’t understand what they say. Oh and here’s a big one. COVID doesn’t cause any increased incidence of myocarditis or pericarditis. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9025013/ Know what does? mRNA biologicals. https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(22)00453-6/fulltext You safe and effective retards will never come around. I’d be lying to myself and everyone around me too if I had been duped into injecting myself 4-5 times with an experimental drug that doesn’t work. Lol.
The study is about post-covid, not during covid. I don't think we ever had any research suggesting myocarditis would happen after recovery. You are an utter imbecile and you keep proving it with every post. From YOUR paper Nevertheless, the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis in COVID-19 vaccine recipients are still significantly lower than the health risks observed in patients with COVID-19. And more from your study it is worth noticing that myocarditis or pericarditis was predominantly mild in the vaccinated individuals. Got owned again by yourself, how long you will continue to embarrass yourself? Papers you posted prove the opposite of what you are claiming. Keep ranting like a boomer grandpa, PUREBLOOD MAGA MAGA STOCKS FLY