strike on iraq

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ElCubano, Sep 6, 2002.

  1. Queen? Dimunitive blathering? oh, i see, emancipation is not a strong point in circles such as yours

    How could you possibly know what my background is?

    not going all out and making the accusation, no, just subtly implying that r7 lied about being a vet,

    No such accusation was made or implied. I simply asked. Or do you take all claims made on the internet as gospel?

    when you know and i know that there is not a chance in a million to prove or disprove that point

    Where do you come up with this lame conclusion? List specific reasons why it can't.

    whilst, at the same time, again managing to evade the salient points from my previous post,

    You made your points on that subject, I made mine; now I'm addressing a different one.

    that it has no impact on the material content of his post

    That's your opinion.

    as to wether he served or not, and if yes, wether he saw combat or not.

    He already claimed he served and he already claimed he saw deadly force. Hell, why doesn't he just answer the question?
     
    #611     Oct 2, 2002
  2. ElCubano

    ElCubano



    Spin City.........:confused:
     
    #612     Oct 2, 2002
  3. Why Mr. ElCubano, brilliant debating point. Challenge anyone to fisticuffs lately?
     
    #613     Oct 2, 2002
  4. vvv

    vvv

    hmm, by inference, ie through applying an act of deriving logical conclusions from premises known or assumed to be true, you see,as you seemed to take my reference to yourself as the female queen, as opposed to the male king , of spin, as an insult, or, as you so succinctly put it, dimunitive blathering.

    as for r7, oh dear , we are moving in a circle here. why not just ask him nicely, and he might entertain your desire for more thorough knowledge on that issue that seems to be bothering you so.

    brent scowcroft, national security advisor to george bush senior and gerald ford:
    Don't Attack Saddam
    It would undermine our antiterror efforts





     
    #614     Oct 2, 2002
  5. Oh, I don't know, vvv . . . what would give you that idea?

    who appointed you inquisitor in chief doubting others?

    so who did appoint you a modern day mcarthy or inquisitor in chief??

    why don't you just apply for the position of national chief inquisitor for hiomeland defense,

    your instrumentalized attack on r7's credibility

    how, pray, should r7 be able to, hmm, verify his claims on a public board? what difference does it make to the material content of his message?

    his military background has zero, nada, to do with the material content of his message.

    all you're doing here is a cheap attempt to undermine the credibility of others

    you do not need to have been a soldier let alone have been involved in warfare to be able to imagine death or mutilation

    that is why r7's background of having or having not been a combat veteran is absolutely immaterial to the content of his posts

    not going all out and making the accusation, no, just subtly implying that r7 lied about being a vet, when you know and i know that there is not a chance in a million to prove or disprove that point

    as for r7, oh dear, we are moving in a circle here.

    challenging the integrity of people here by pretending to desire knowledge of issues that cannot be proven in a board like this, and that have no relevance to the contents of r7's posts.

    yes, and thoroughly right those allegations are too.


     
    #615     Oct 2, 2002
  6. ElCubano

    ElCubano


    If you look back at the posts you are refering to you will see I never challenged you to any "fisticuffs"...I just simply stated I would love to teach you the meaning of respect......then of course the "Queen of spin" that you are; you spun it around.......

    Why would anyone want to debate you??.......you are "the rope a dope queen"
     
    #616     Oct 2, 2002
  7. vvv

    vvv

    i have no idea about that, but at least he isn't challenging the integrity of people here by pretending to desire knowledge of issues that cannot be proven in a board like this, and that have no relevance to the contents of r7's posts.
     
    #617     Oct 2, 2002
  8. vvv

    vvv

    yes, and thoroughly right those allegations are too.

    my, how clever.


    brent scowcroft, national security advisor to george bush senior and gerald ford:
    Don't Attack Saddam
    It would undermine our antiterror efforts

     
    #618     Oct 2, 2002
  9. vvv

    vvv

    yes, you are right, sometimes the insight is there but the flesh is weak, hmm.

    i do wonder, though, what with max's insistence on delving into others private backgrounds just to shed some doubt on the material content of their messages, if the dear boy, now that we have verified his gender, is actually planning on applying for a tour of duty himself?

    or if he would prefer to be a couch potato warrior, with a remote control as his only weapon and a beer or two his only consolation for a missed opportunity to hmm, go kick some ass.

    but, then again, how could he prove his reply to us?

    oh dear.

    brent scowcroft, national security advisor to george bush senior and gerald ford:
    Don't Attack Saddam
    It would undermine our antiterror efforts





     
    #619     Oct 2, 2002
  10. Oh, my oh, my, Mr. ElCubano. I do apologize. You see, when you sent me this PM:

    "...you tell me when you want to come down here......Parameters??? you tell me....I am ichin' to show some nigga like you what the word respect is all about....."

    I mistakenly mistook your kind words for some kind of challenge to a physical contest of force, rather than the tea and crumpets at the Mandarin that I'm sure you intended.
     
    #620     Oct 2, 2002