strike on iraq

yeee haaaaaaaa

 

uhhhhhh

 

Far as I know, this is his natural state.

who loves ya, Faster??

 

I read the article that started this thread and basically it was just taking out an airfield and some radar installations. Just a prelimary attack

 

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38441-2002Sep4.html

 

i heard on the news our planes were policing the no fly zone and iraq fired on us. it was pointed out that firing on a plane, civilian or non-civilian, is an act of war. anyway, i guess we just took out some targets that make it easier for us to police the no fly zone without being fired upon as easily.

 

That's one of the most biased articles I've read in a while.

 

nice one wild..(groan)

i must say, even for an unashamadely leftist publication like the post, that was decidedly biased article..

 

Daniel my man,
I wouldn't point to the Washington Post. It was just an editorial. Not an opinion of the paper.

There are not many papers in the country (if any) that would not publish an opinion contributed by a former President.

Peace,
rs7

 

ahh yeah...jimmy carter. i missed that (hey - he was before my time)