Funny how liberals accept that this story is gospel when it was in fact reported by In Touch...one of the most dishonest tabloids in the world. http://gawker.com/5638480/which-tabloids-lie-the-most Yes, this was a cover story from 2011 and as you can see from the link, their cover stories are only truthful 9% of the time. Both Trump and Stormy denied this story. Why are they not believed over a tabloid that makes it's money selling lies?
And if she denies it all like Hillary did will you accept that? And why the hate towards Melania? Do you hate Hillary for marrying Bill? You judge Melania, but not Hillary? Who would Hillary be if not for Bill? Some no name ACLU lawyer defending rapists and illegals more than likely. Hillary has built her entire career based on a business partner relationship with Bill and lied through her f'n teeth for decades defending him. You judge Trump and give Bill a pass, all because of your politics, nothing more. You're full of shit up to your ears. At the end of the day it's between her and Trump. You guys are the first to tell us how liberated the euro's are about sex. Maybe she just said hey Don, go get yourself some strange. Who could blame her if it got his fat ass off her for awhile. Phony Russians and pussy on the side. That's the big story?You guys got some work to do.
Skipping the obvious who was it that hounded Bill into impeachment again and are now asking for..?... What do you make of Melania lying about having a degree until just before the campaign? In her "college years" (missing years) she was many reasonably believe an escort. Every other girl working for her model agency was and somehow a "student" paid for expensive plastic surgery, NYC rent etc. So Donald married a pro and probably has the evidence to prove it i.e to blackmail her (his wife). He released those nude pics of her himself during the campaign when he was being pounded about the gold star mother insult. After two divorces he made sure the next marriage was business. Not exactly apples to apples there.
"Family values" cons mobbing the big old boobs thread. If you had seen the Rupert Murdock's News of the World and Sun in 80s UK, he basically invented false moral outrage from ugly old perverts. I guess it came from observing Aussie conservatism growing up.
If she is running a WH team whose mission is to intimidate and trash victims of her husband's sexual harassment, yes. If she decides to run for public office and has a record of covering up scandals, corruption and misconduct by her husband and her colleagues, yes. If she runs for public office claiming to be a women's advocate yet has a long history of enabling her husband's sexual harassment and of attempting to slime women whom she knew to be telling the truth, yes. Otherwise, no. Glad to be able to clear that up for you.