I`m very impressed with this post........it is brutally honest.....the people that pose & posture here can learn alot from these words.
Though I sympathize with Sandybestdog's misfortunes I would have to disagree that there is a lot to learn from the post you cite. His posts protrude more of a "everything bad happens to me and that's just the way it is" victim mentality. I could write stories of misfortune experienced by people that I personally know and if you dig down enough under the surface you will find how they are in large part responsible for creating their situations, if not just from their attitude alone. People are given situations and there are an infinite number of ways to respond to them, but the response each individual makes means everything. Using a guy that lost his business because of tight credit and the poor economy is bad example. I could tell a story about a guy who lost his business but before hand had made 50 sales calls a day to expand a business on the side for a second stream of income. The second guy thrives in 09 with a poor economy and the first guy fails and blames it on luck. Try telling the second guy who goes on to make millions in his second business that he got lucky.
A lot of people fail a lot of times before they really hit the news. We should give these defaulters some slack.. Look at George Custer, his life was a long string of failures before his l Last Stand and his name went into the history books...
He lost the battle.And as it is said,most battles are won/lost before they are fought.If i remember right,he split his force into 3 parts which was a fatal mistake ,proving the rule.Finally,he was killed,therefore....... he failed to survive....am i wrong? Unfortunately,credit cards didn't exist in his day so t666 will be unable to say whether or not he was a loser under the narrow terms of his definition...and therefore by default,t666 would have won the battle of little bighorn based purely on the fact that he pays his bills on time
Neatly sidestepped my question in your typical hypocritical way.The statement is self explanatory so does not need to be addressed (by which you mean retracted) and far from me not liking you quoting it,since i have reposted it here, the statement stands.Since you keep taking it out of context lets be clear about the context - your opinion is irrelevant.As for calling me childish,not a single post i've made could be deemed childish unless you define childish as disagreeing with you.And this from a guy that posts big pictures with the word loser repeatedly. Lmao, How childish is that?! As i said before 'you are the weak' no doubt you will prove that by reposting the same old crap while failing to see the subtlety of the truth of that statement. The fact that,by implication,you view yourself as a winner while acting like an anonymous internet troll is,frankly,...........laughable
Another one of lifes' 'policemen'.Funny how they tend to congregate here What do you care? Why not stick to what you do best,...handing out useless advice to the rest of the clueless?
Hey loser... sorry I didn't see that you "replied" to my post until now. Again... explain this statement of yours, which is contrary to the righteous bullshit you've also posted. You even tried to obfuscate your way out of your support for spanish's credit card deadbeating. So it's no surprise you'd call me a hypocrite when you are one and claim the quote is somehow "out of context." LOL!!! And if my opinion's really irrelevant, why do you keep replying? P.S. Make up your mind yet about cheating on your wife? if the need arises in the future to screw the banks or anyone else for that matter,i won't hesitate and your opinion will be irrelevant.I see that as winning not losing geddit?