That's a nice example, even a 5th grader like me understands!! Time, degrees, geographics, and as someone points out, illumination... how far down the rabbit hole does it go. I'll continue to disagree... the exact time/place/degrees is repeatable.
I found a site with a mention of a 32 lunar month being the correct solution. Unfortunately, it's old and many of the links are not valid. http://www.bonniehill.net/pages/cycles.html#data about 1/3 (lol) of the way down the page it has Delta Phenom stuff.
Yes, that's me. On other forums I have used the handle 4xis2ez. What you found there was when FXCM was an ongoing broker in the US. On dailyfx.com forum my handle was Howdyy. Here is the link to free download of historical data. I think you have to sign up or login with Facebook or something like that. https://www.dukascopy.com/swiss/english/marketwatch/historical/
https://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-07/first-direct-evidence-points-existence-space-wind/ plasmaspheric breeze.
Here's my current 32 LM calendar. And the 96 LM also. I prefer the 96 lunar month time frame as it is a multiple of 32 and includes both the shorter and longer term cycles in the same solution.
You said "wind speed in outer space." What you are quoting there is neither "wind" nor "outer space". I digress.
bayesian_analysis_of_lunar_effects_on_stock_returns_liu.pdf has which refers to lunar_cycle_effects_in_stock_returns_dichev.pdf attached in my previous post and also