Steve46 and Hypostomus Debate Trading Strategy

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by hypostomus, Jul 4, 2006.

  1. Steve. Thanks. I don't read C-C, which iks apparently where that denizen of the deep lurks. An asshole by any other name is still an asshole. I 've got his number because he's posting rather than trading. (I'M not trading because my system tells me to take a nap now, or waste my time on ET.) Oh, and his responses are sooooo elegantly intelligent, the punk! Lets see an execution report, punk. Yours not as big as mine? You CAN'T, can you, because you don't TRADE, hahahaha! Mike.
     
    #101     Jul 6, 2006
  2. Exodus

    Exodus

    fhl

    I don't think that Dennis was quantifiable because the true concept and skills required to make a method so, have not really been available (technically) till recently (the last 5 years).

    As far as Niederhoffer goes I don't really have enough information to comment on him.

    I can assure you that those that do trade quant sucessfully will NOT be in the spotlight and you won't read about them in any industry mags any time soon.



    Hypo - your a funny guy :D :D :D

    Funny guys like you are always welcome on the other side of my trade.

    btw, I don't scalp for 2-3 pointers like you tough guys I'm not that skilled ..... LOLOLOLOLOL
     
    #102     Jul 6, 2006
  3. fhl

    fhl

    Now it is becoming obvious why others ignore your posts.
     
    #103     Jul 6, 2006
  4. Exodus

    Exodus

    Do you think that just because Dennis method was teachable that it was TRULY a quantifiable edge?
     
    #104     Jul 6, 2006
  5. Odus. Oh, sorry, you're an EX-odus. Try 7.25 NQ points. And you're avoiding the subject, which is YOU.
     
    #105     Jul 6, 2006
  6. Exodus

    Exodus

    In order to PROVE anything we would need to show TAX returns for the last 20 years.
     
    #106     Jul 6, 2006
  7. I am developing the (not so) tacit conclusion that you two don't much like each other. Don't ask me how I know; it's a gift.
     
    #107     Jul 6, 2006
  8. Perhaps some backtesting is in order.

    Data point #1

    "Up yours"

    "Oh yeah, you're an asshole"


    Data point #2

    "Your a jerk"

    "Oh yeah, you're a walking dildo"


    Data point #3

    "You wear diapers"

    "Oh yeah, well bite me"


    Yes I am starting to see a trend.

    Now for some "walk forward" testing.
     
    #108     Jul 6, 2006
  9. Odus, you're not OLD enough to have paid taxes for 20 years, unless you were filing to collect Aid to Dependent Children. My pretax income has increased over 40 fold since I started working. If I have to count on the likes of you to keep Social Security afloat, I guess I'll have to KEEP working.
     
    #109     Jul 6, 2006
  10. ER9

    ER9

    lol....no i think thats explicit knowledge :p
     
    #110     Jul 6, 2006