Being stupid does not make you an asshole. And you're correct on prejudgment. That's why you must look at the whole body of work of each party. But after looking at the party and determining that they are an a-s-s-h-o-l, it stands to reason that the "e" is sort of evident. And should you happen to subscribe to the same logic and actions that allows one party to be deemed an asshole, welcome to the club pal! And yes, sometimes you can prejudge situations and people. Notice I did not use color, or ethnicity. You see assholes can freely be determined ~ universally across all boundaries.
Yep, I am sure you'd be more than happy not to have government mandated FDIC insurance of your bank deposits (and other banking safeguards intended to make sure that you'll get your money back), right? Obviously you don't need labels stating the amount of calories and fat in the food you eat, you would not hesitate to take your kids to a park or let them swim in a lake located next to a chemical plant if there was no EPA, you would have no fear of flying if the lowest private bidder, not FAA contolled the skies and directed air traffic and if airlines did not have to comply with extremely demanding FAA repair and maintenance guidelines, you would not hesitate to give your child a drug rushed to market by a pharmaceutical company without rigorous FDA testing... Nah, fuck the government, what is it good for anyway, we can take companies like Refco on when they steal our money all by ourselves, right? Hmm, you are from the south, aren't you?
LOL. Here you are, a black guy who probably grew up a few miles from me and we're in agreement. Z lives in an all white suburb of San Diego. Since he doesn't know ANYONE other than white, California libs, he can't make assumptions based on interaction. Unless of course it's his absolutes about the motives of conservatives, Republicans, regressives and Christians. THOSE generalizations are fine because loZZer deems them correct. I stick by my original statement although you are CLEARLY in the 60%.
I would hope that the 60% is in relation to intelligent verses Z10's assholes. Although, I could probably be classified that way in the hood when I tell them to get off the collective wide asses.
Conservatives, republicans, regressives are the way they are as a function of and a product of their choices of thinking. Race, ethnicity, gender are a not a function of choice, nor an attitude, nor an adopted way of thinking. What a bozo you is....
It never fails to amaze me just how impervious to the evidence of your complete and utter failure you Democrats are. In your case, doo, it's understandable, since your a Jew, and being a Democrat is your only option (as you see it). But the others, especially the (non-Jewish) white Democrats, their level of self-delusion is simply breathtaking. The sad thing is that the problems are only going to continue to get worse. The hereditarian point of view explains so much more of what we observe than does the environmentalist, and from a hereditarian perspective, welfare has simply enabled a genetic underclass to rise as a proportion of the population, meaning in that in coming years, every current problem is going to be magnified by the magnitude of that rise. And when you couple that effect with mass immigration, liberal behavior (especially sexual) standards, lax attitudes to crime and law enforcement and anti-white 'racism' indoctrination, predictions of coming disaster are a complete no-brainer.
And even then, in the wake of all that crap happening, they will continue to call for more enabling programs flush with the need for more cash. And they will DEMAND your tolerance of the negative behaviors in the name of not stifling some creativity or free speech. They will need an increase in the taxes of the "Wealthy" to ensure that "ALL" can equally access and benefit regardless of fiscal abilities. And, then they will tell you that humanitarian justice will preclude you from denying access to even those who are not American or contributing to the available fiscal resource pool. All justified because we are the richest nation on the globe. We are the so-called leader and champion of fiscal abilities of the downtrodden. I say, bull (fill in the appropriate statement as you so feel).
LOL, how simplistic spec8or, I do expect better from you. The issues I am usually talking about go way beyond welfare and affect not only "genetic underclass" as you put it but also the working poor and middle class (in other words 80% of the country). The minimum wage issue for example has nothing to do with welfare, if anything it will probably help take people off welfare and into workforce. The situation with Healthcare in this country is catastrophic (you won't understand, you're in Australia enjoying guaranteed high quality universal healtcare), again lots of people stay on welfare and won't get a job because they'll lose their medicaid coverage. Outsourcing hurts working americans big time, the recently passed bankruptcy bill heavily favors irresponsible corporations over irresponsible individuals etc. The situation with welfare is the least of my concerns. At any rate, my previous post was about right wing religiosity, when you refuse to help the poor (for whatever reason) you're not a true christian. Period. Jesus could also talk about heredity, "genetic underclass", "entitlement mentality" blah blah blah ... but he did not.
Hi spect8or I also believe in genetic determinism for a lot of things. I just wonder, you mention the genetic underclass. Would you say that Asians are below or above East Indians in this hierarchy? Also, would you say that blacks are below or above whites? Lastly, how about East Indian vs. whites?? Thanks, Nik