Wasn't my intention. Clinton FAILED would have been a more accurate statement. STILL making Clinton at least as responsible for 911 as Bush.
There was nothing accurate about your first statement to make this statement more accurate Congrats for changing your tune though
Not sure what that's supposed to mean but I said, in effect, the first statement wasn't accurate. I'm not changing THIS tune though. Clinton IS at least as much to blame for 911 as Bush.
Clinton tried and failed,Bush didn't try at all...Big difference Even after 9-11 Bush admitted he wasn't trying <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ntkoqiNJunE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Horse shit, we invaded Afghanistan in part to get him, in case you forgot. Not really, he made a very poor choice of words. Kinda like Odumbo claiming he had "visited 57 states with one to go". At that point we had no idea where he was.
Bush is not to blame for 9-11 because he didn't get Bin Laden,Bush is to blame (by way of negligence /incompetence)because he didn't act on CIA intelligence he had months in advance to try to stop the attack.
If he invaded Afghanistan to get Bin Laden that is almost as stupid as invading Iraq Lets invade and occupy Afghanistan to get an individual thats on the run ...great plan.Lets invade Iraq,even greater plan If he invaded Afghanistan to get Bin Laden that was stupid,if he invaded Afghanistan with the hopes of ridding it of the Tailban Clint Eastwood said it best " You didn't learn from Russia "
Then WHY are we still in Afghanistan YEARS after we could have been out? According to you it can only be stupidity ergo Odumbo IS stupid.