Spyware found in MB trading Sotware

I see no evidence of this on my machine that Ad-Aware is detecting this anomoly.

When I search in my browser for "broker" the first hit that comes up is TDAmeritrade.com. In fact MBTrading doesnt come up at all on the results page.

 

You are so completely full of shit.

Just stop spending you life on porn sites and the spyware problems will go away. Get a woman you fucker.

 

See - here you are. A fuck stick you are. Get a life shit eater.

 

I am an IT Guy. 15 years. I took a snapshot of my disk. Loaded the demo. Took another snapshot. Compared the two.

Result - still shit eaters.

MBTrading is the finest outfit there is for Forex. Always was. Always will be.

 

I love 18 year olds (Maybe 15??)

Go hump your sister - your dad is done with her now.

 

Turn him in. Turn in MB. Of course, anon won;t work, it is ignored because of the frivolous nature anon has.

So - do it in person - and identify yourself. Do it over an over again. Once they geet sick of you and the rest of you bucket shop retards, they will finally prosecute you into the Slam You in The Ass Penitentiary.

You'll be busier that than the freakin' Holland tunnel.

Shit eating Ass Blaster.

 

Typical MB client?

 

You are joking right? Seriously, if you are not joking I do not know how anyone could view any of your comments as being at all credible.

Why are there so many out there that are in love with their broker?

 

I agree, Very Typical.....

 

There are different variations of the CommonName crap

Spybot checks for two verison one is considered Spybot and the other a hijacker.

Spyblaster blocks for it as well

If you install both free products and do the immunization functions the products offer then the CommonName wouldn't of installed in the first place.

If you feel that MB is in the wrong then the FTC is the place to complain to.

But on the other hand MB Steve may have made a simple request from the programmers to add adverising and the programmer may have chosen to use CommonName. I won't except the Pres to be a programmer. If this is the case any Pres worth his salt would request the change be made to remove it and the next user upgrade would see it removed. Not defending MB but only the next build will tell what type of company an end user is truly dealing with.

My two cents, fwiw
Bsulli