EDIT: I have been catching up the weekends post and now see that this has been answered already.oops. I think the answer is probably no. I posted a similar question a few pages back and got a couple of PMs from people who had unsuccessfully tried to locate these. Perhaps someone who is in personal contact might ask JH? I did notice that earlier in this thread Spyder said he might talk about IF1 IF2 at the end of the journal. Cheers.
cnms2 Here is my chart marked with 2 of the trades I took yesterday. The first trade was only for 2 ticks, I shorted thinking it was an FTT but the volume wasn't too convincing so I exited. I'm very fond of VEs as they give me a clue to pending FTTs, the next trade appeared after several VEs, I wish I had been long but missed the move so I waited for the change to occur in form of FTT. I had meant to ride the trade down but my bracket trader was set at 1.5 points.
You had two winning trades, and that was great! On the other hand, if the only tools you use are the ES and YM channels and gaussians, I think that in both cases you may have entered too early. If you wait for the new tape to form (and annotate it), then trust it and enter near its RTL, you'll doubt less your entry (that often results in a premature exit), and you'll avoid entering small retraces (that you have to quickly exit, or take a loss). Following this advice you'd've skipped your first trade, but would've made quite a bit more from the second.
From your channel annotation, as well as from the two trades you've described, it seems that you're more oriented toward catching reversals. In my opinion, JH's method is more about trading with the trend: establish a channel / tape (asap), then have it show you where the price is going, more than watching for its TLs' breaks as signals for reversals.