Spydertrader's Jack Hershey Futures Trading Journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Dec 30, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cnms2

    cnms2

    6 charts: 30 minutes, 4 trades, +3 points

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1668858 width=512>
     
    #7381     Nov 6, 2007
  2. I saw this as a big pennant formation and forest level retrace as cnms stated.
     
    #7382     Nov 6, 2007
  3. cnms2

    cnms2

    6 charts: 30 minutes, 4 trades, +3 points

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1668862 width=512>
     
    #7383     Nov 6, 2007
  4. cnms2

    cnms2

    6 charts: 30 minutes, 4 trades, +3 points

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1668864 width=512>
     
    #7384     Nov 6, 2007
  5. cnms2

    cnms2

    6 charts: 30 minutes, 4 trades, +3 points

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1668868 width=512>
     
    #7385     Nov 6, 2007
  6. In general, I don't see a great deal of consistentcy regarding this matter. I see a whole bunch of different combinations of volume patterns through a 1-2-3 tape sequence.

    Fore example, at the beginning of the journal, Spyder discusses how to distinguish between a hitch and FTT on January 4. He uses the attached image as an example.

    If you take a look at the opening 1-2-3 formation, you'll notice that pt. 1 to pt. 2 has decreasing to increasing volume, which is still ok.

    But pt. 2 to pt. 3 starts with increasing volume, then decreases, then increases again, all in the same tape.

    If anyone would like to chime in, feel free.

    RoughTrader
     
    #7386     Nov 6, 2007
  7. I found that period pretty tiring I should have had a snooze. The bigger picture was a little clearer (non dom traverse back to the main right hand channel for the day). I marked that whole segment as red declining though it could be argued that volume was flat.

    Despite that I found myself mis-reading at the tree level just before the break. Foolishly I allowed that to cloud my judgement until I synced back up as things became obvious again.

    Note to self - when in doubt go with the bigger picture :)
     
    #7387     Nov 6, 2007
  8. cnms2

    cnms2

    Fractals ... Fractals ... Fractals ...

    What you see is the superposition of sentiment sinusoid like waves of sentiment. See the P V AD diagram.

    Your monitoring fractal acts like a filter that integrates faster fractals. From the sentiment fractals you can see, the faster ones will show sine waves at tape level, and the others at larger and larger channel levels. For the larger fractals you have to eye ball their effects.

    courtesy of makosgu
    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1668890>
     
    • pvad.gif
      File size:
      24.6 KB
      Views:
      692
    #7388     Nov 6, 2007
  9. Your chart shows a Sym Pennant Formation. If you choose to go back and review the discussions at the time (wise advice already handed to you), note how Formations did not enter the discussion until September. Now, armed with information on Formations, you can then determine how best to use that information. As others have already advised, you might find this process easier by learning the methods themselves first. ETLurker found automating in such a fashion quite successful.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #7389     Nov 6, 2007
  10. Allow me to rephrase...

    That was as tough of a properly annotated retrace that I have seen on the ES :D
     
    #7390     Nov 6, 2007
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.