Spyder, Had a question on the dips at 14:10 & 14:40 on todays chart. The notation starts on the first bar of the dip. These look like they are 3 bars long, start to finish. Is that correct? Regards - EZ
Really enjoy doing charts on QT except when my lines disappear. all gaussians wiped out . so I did them over but did not color them for fear of another erase. ymu7 2minute. Good w/e everyone.
Being in the chat room whenever possible and reviewing the logs, going over charts bar by bar on the discussion sequences, has made a significant difference. The discussion of retrace of retrace triggered one of the better aha moments. Started seeing flaws after fttâs to signal hold/continue in retraces and fttâs after flaws in retraces to get back on the dominant side. Knowing, and comfirming by "what must come next". This has been there the whole time just never saw it like this. You gotta love dips , either fractal, they are frequent, reliable, potentially powerful and if followed by an ftt, significant. Recflecting on things I realized I was using very limited tools. For the most part I have no idea what the str/sqz, time and sales, and DOM other than the cumulative lean during active times, has been doing.. I need to screenrecord so I can go back and see what the other tools were doing at these times, if I miss them. That should bring me up to speed finally :? I can not see all this intrabar on the ES yet and realize this is important. Had to use the 2 min fractal a lot to get to this point. Something else to work on. It is apparent now, correctly implementing the additional tools will bring the lower resolution levels into focus. Best to all. Thank You for this Spyder.
Just to share my 'post-it' about : "What to I have to see next for 'Continuation' or 'Change' ?" We should know all of this without thinking, but sometimes it's good to have the chance to glance at it for confirmation. If you note any mistakes or something that can be added please message me. Best Regards,
Hi Pepe, I like your matrix, but wish to point something out to you. Assuming each element of the matrix is defining change/continuation on the same resolution level, then dec red in an uptrend (for example) is CONTINUATION, not CHANGE. It is change on a lower fractal or resolution level, but it represents continuation on the larger fractal.