Spydertrader's Jack Hershey Equities Journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Sep 25, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. paultx

    paultx

    SIGM also signaled a trade this morning.
    Average DU was 120,809.
    SIGM had traded 80,286 shares by 10:30.
    Price was 9.13. This was .54 above the previous day's close.
    Stochcastics were 84.29 and 75.75.
    MACD was positive.
    It did not acheive FRV by EOD and was closed at 8.81 for a 3.5% loss.
     
    #971     Apr 20, 2005
  2. Thanks for posting your results.

    I didn't receive a trade signal this morning, but I believe that is due to the different Dry Up Volume calculations used between the two of us - rather than data source variances as we have seen in the past. Make sure you aren't combining several variants of the Hershey Methodology into one. If you use the 'Dry Up Volume Range' Chartscript, we determine In Dry Up / Not In Dry Up by using the High Band (Which in the case of SIGM is roughly 180,000). If you are going to use Average DU, then SIGM would not have been "In Dry Up" on the previous day (average dry up=120,000 and Previous day Volume = 150,000). Based on the volume for SIGM and the (attached) chart, you may have simply experienced a False Breakout (FBO), but I wanted to make sure your current methodology utilized a consistent calculation.

    I hope you find the above explanation helpful.

    - Spydertrader

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=732985>
     
    #972     Apr 21, 2005
  3. 2005-04-21, Thursday - Lists

    I used RS Setting of 90 and EPS Setting of 80 for the following lists

    Stocktables.com
    Sevens - Ones - Zeros
    FFIV - CDIS - HP
    IRIS - PTEN - MCRS
    UTHR - CMC - CEDC
    JOYG - ELOS - NXTP
    APCS - MCRI - URBN
    JLG - SNDA - NSS
    LCAV - CMTL - ISRG
    NXTP - MDRX - MFLX
    CEDC - KOSP - USPI
    SNHY - ANTP - CCJ

    Wealth-Lab Chartscript/Manual
    Hotlist

    ANTP
    SNHY
    MFLX
    ELOS
    MCRI
    SNDA
    FFIV

    Wealth-Lab Data/Yahoo Data
    Watch List

    DCAI - DU Cycle - DU5
    TASR - DU Cycle - DU5
    FRD - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10
    SYNA - DU Cycle
    MFLX - DU Cycle
    ELOS - DU Cycle
    SIGM - DU Cycle
    EZPW - DU Cycle
    SNDA - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10
    PARL - DU Cycle
    LCBM - DU Cycle
    SPTN - DU Cycle
    BCSI - DU Cycle
    JUPM - DU Cycle

    Wealth-Lab Developer Data & Equations/G33M4K Equations
    SRVZ Wealth Lab Equations - Dry Up (with G33M4K Score)

    DCAI - 0
    EZPW - 7

    Eyeball
    Gallas2 "Keep an Eye on These" Stocks

    SNDA (Attached)

    Yahoo Data/G33M4K Equations
    Dry Up Stocks with G33M4K Master List Score of Zero

    DCAI
    TASR
    ELOS
    JUPM

    Wealth-Lab DU Volume Range - Hershey V2.0.1 / QCharts Data
    Dry Up Stocks and G33M4K Master List Score

    EZPW - 7
    JUPM - 0
    SNDA - 7
    TASR - 0

    Stocktables Sort/Qcharts/G33M4K Equations/
    Test Culling Method with Score Hotlist

    DCAI 0
    ELOS 0
    FORD 0
    TRGL 0
    USG 0
    XXIA 0
    MFLX 2
    GDP 4
    FFIV 6
    EZPW 7
    SNDA 7

    SNHY & ANTP failed to make the Final Universe List due to insufficient float.

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=732986>
     
    #973     Apr 21, 2005
  4. 2005-04-21, Thursday - Update

    Our system generated three signals this morning when actual volume exceeded calculated 50% pro-rata Dry Up Volume.

    The first signal occurred with LCBM, but a quick check of the average daily volume for LCBM shows less than optimal levels. As a result, I did not take any action with respect to trading LCBM, and plan to delete LCBM from the Final Universe List at the end of the month based on its average volume.

    The Second signal occurred at 10:22 AM with MFLX. We see price improvement ($19.70, up $2.18 from previous day close at time of signal generation). MACD (+.2007) and The Stochastic Indicator (97.1146) fell within desired parameters. As a result, I enter into a long position with MFLX.

    04/21/05 10:24:37 19.76 19.75 19.76 1500

    Target Price: $21.73
    Initial Stop: $18.82

    Our third signal of the morning occurred at 10:30 AM with EZPW. We did not see price improvement ($13.08, down .63 from previous day close at time of signal generation). MACD (+.0122)was only slightly positive, and The Stochastic Indicator (43.5566) fell outside desired parameters. As a result, I took no action with respect to EZPW - either long or short.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #974     Apr 21, 2005
  5. 1500 of MFLX.. doesnt that seem as to big a position size for your account?
     
    #975     Apr 21, 2005
  6. Only slightly so.

    Using $69,000 USD account as a basis and a 5% initial stop loss on the per share purchase price of $19.76 USD, my risk calculator indicates a maximum share size of 1468 - using 2% risk for the account. I'm certainly not going to fret over 32 shares.

    - Spydertrader

    Edit: I found the Risk Calculator posted in another thread and shared by another ET Member. I also posted a copy of the same calculator earlier in this thread.
     
    #976     Apr 21, 2005
  7. 2005-04-21, Thursday - Update

    Depending on the method used for Dry Up Volume calculation, MFLX may or may not have exceeded FRV levels. Several methods indicate that it has, while a few methods indicate that it has not. As a result, I plan to hold the 1500 shares MFLX at least until tomorrow.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #977     Apr 21, 2005
  8. smtrader

    smtrader

    Spydertrader,

    Looks to me like, that at the time of signal generation, MFLX was already up 11% on the day. I know you to typically be extremely risk adverse, and although this stock didn't gap up, it did rise in price considerably from last nights close.

    What were your thoughts when you entered the trade? Personally, I am surprised you took the trade, so I would be interested to get your insight.

    Also, I have noticed that a few of the stocks in your universe are currently unranked using the Hershey Equities Rank 2.0.1. MIPS is a good example of this, an unranked stock that you took a trade in.

    You indicate that aside from using WL to calculate rank, you use a "manual" method... can you go into this and why it is different? Are you allowing some tolerance levels to the 20% rule? This is assuming that you track rank daily (give or take a day or two) and would eliminate a stock as soon as it becomes unranked.

    Thanks again, and good luck on the MFLX trade.
     
    #978     Apr 21, 2005
  9. While MFLX had already improved in price by 11%, the price appreciation occurred over time. Unlike gapped stocks (that often fill retreating back from their gap open price) gradual price improvement often continues for a few days if volume levels support such price increases.

    Because price had already moved a great deal, I didn't anticipate reaching the target price of 10% gain. However, I anticipated price continuing to rise providing a smaller gain. Now, I don't mean to say that I think price won't make the full 10% - just that I didn't anticipate it doing so. In addition, by moving my stop intraday yesterday with the MIPS short, price crossing my stop price caused me to miss out on the full run. As a result, I decided not follow the price up as closely today allowing a little more "wiggle room."

    I don't immediately delete each stock that loses its rank. Often a stock that loses a rank resumes its ranked status after a few days. Although not the case with MIPS, 'tenured stocks' remain in the list even without rank. We have a few other examples of stocks that will probably get the axe very soon. TASR with its recent earnings miss (currently listed as nil) and LCBM with lower than desired average daily volume are two examples of such stocks. I keep them around a while just to make sure.

    Earlier in the Journal, I posted dkm's Assessment Sheet for use with manually calculating rank. An additional copy can be found at the MSN Jack Hershey Strategies Web Site. I use the manual method less frequently now (only rarely). Occasionally, a manual method indicated a rank, while the Wealth-Lab Method did not (or vice-versa). The differences arise from how The Wealth-Lab Chartscript calculates a 20% gain (low to high). The 20% rule is a 'minimum' gain we look to see. Greater than 20% is always nice. Because a stock might resume its ranked status within a few days of losing its rank, I now drop the unranked stocks (unless they have 'tenured' status) at the end of each month. So, while MIPS no longer had a rank, it still had a spot in the Final Universe List. As a result, it still had trade eligibility.

    Thank-you, I may need it. The indicators didn't provide me with a conclusive signal, and as a result, I went with the majority and held. I hope you find the above information useful.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #979     Apr 21, 2005
  10. 2005-04-22, Friday - Lists

    I used RS Setting of 90 and EPS Setting of 80 for the following lists

    Stocktables.com
    Sevens - Ones - Zeros
    ASPM - URBN - NSS
    FORD - VPI - CTSH
    MFLX - ADSK - LCAV
    USNA - NXTP - AFFX
    SRDX - ACI - HP
    SNDA - CMTL - USPI
    WWCA - PTEN - LSS
    MACR - JLG - CHTT
    PRGS - CDIS - USG
    IPS - ANTP - AAPL

    Wealth-Lab Chartscript/Manual
    Hotlist

    ANTP
    FORD
    MFLX
    SNDA
    USG

    Wealth-Lab Data/Yahoo Data
    Watch List

    DCAI - DU Cycle
    FRD - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10
    EXM - DU Cycle
    ELOS - DU Cycle
    SIGM - DU Cycle - DU5
    MSB - DU Cycle - DU5
    PARL - DU Cycle - DU5
    GDP - DU Cycle
    JUPM - DU Cycle - DU5
    COGT - DU Cycle

    Wealth-Lab Developer Data & Equations/G33M4K Equations
    SRVZ Wealth Lab Equations - Dry Up (with G33M4K Score)

    DCAI - 2

    Eyeball
    Gallas2 "Keep an Eye on These" Stocks

    JUPM (Attached)

    Yahoo Data/G33M4K Equations
    Dry Up Stocks with G33M4K Master List Score of Zero

    ELOS

    Wealth-Lab DU Volume Range - Hershey V2.0.1 / QCharts Data
    Dry Up Stocks and G33M4K Master List Score

    COGT - 5
    FRD - 5
    JUPM - 5
    PARL - 5
    SIGM - 5

    Stocktables Sort/Qcharts/G33M4K Equations/
    Test Culling Method with Score Hotlist

    ELOS 0
    USG 0
    XXIA 1
    DCAI 2
    FFIV 3
    GDP 5
    PARL 5
    FORD 7
    MFLX 7
    SNDA 7
    TRGL 7

    ANTP failed to make the Final Universe List due to insufficient float.

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=734024>
     
    #980     Apr 22, 2005
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.