Spydertrader's Jack Hershey Equities Journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Sep 25, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Unfortunately, no. In order for a stock to make the hot list, it must have had dry up volume the day before. I currently use a variety of Dry Up Formulae in order to determine the "best" method for Dry Up Volume calculation. Unfortunately, no single method has stood out above the rest. TASR only has dry up volume on the previous day using the DU Cycle Formula. All other formulae do not place TASR into Dry Up. Therefore, current volume must exceed that level of volume calculated by that particular formula placing the stock in Dry up the day before (in our case Du Cycle - for TASR). Each method of dry up volume acts independently. TASR's actual volume for yesterday exceeded the calculated DRY Up Volume for DU5 - DU10 & Du20. Therefore TASR was not in Dry Up according to these formulae.

    Often a stock will find itself in Dry Up based on all methods used (IDSA & ESMC today). In that case, you can use the lowest level of volume for entry because that level is also the level of dry up volume. With TASR today, the lower levels of volume were not.

    As a result, that is why TASR did not trigger any signals for me today - volume did not exceed DU Volume (DU Cycle) nor was there enough pro-rata volume at 10:00, 10:30 or 11:00 AM (Again, based on DU Cycle). At about 1:00 PM this afternoon, TASR actual volume finally exceeded the only volume which had it in dry up the day before (DU Cycle).

    Now, having said all that, we currently have a revised set of entry criteria that enters earlier based on previous day volume (PDV) on stocks that are currently in dry up AND have a G33M4K Master List Score of Zero. While additional testing is required before drawing conclusions, early results indicate we may have something of value. As a result, I encourage you to track your results using your entry methods over time and report your findings. You may uncover when a stock has a certain 'score' it is best to alter your entry criteria as you did today.

    I hope that helped.

    - Spydertrader

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=645329>
     
    #561     Dec 10, 2004
  2. Once again, I altered the settings at the stocktables.com web site in order to obtain the correct number of stocks: RS: 80 - EPS: 90

    Sevens - Ones - Zeros
    EEFT - SEM - CMTL
    ACMR - MRVL - AMHC
    HOLX - LNCR - CSE
    FARO - DRIV - CTSH
    NGPS - CYTC - UPL
    DHI - CKFR - DVA
    FFIV - PACT - AMX
    ANT - BLL - NIHD
    AFFX - EAGL
    RIO - URBN

    Hotlist

    PACT
    NGPS
    FFIV

    Watch List

    IDSA - DU Cycle
    ESMC - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
    BCSI - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10
    CALM - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
    TRMM - DU Cycle
    HRT - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
    SWIR - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
    ALDN - DU Cycle
    EVCI - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
    NAVR - DU Cycle
    ENWV - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
    HANS - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10
    BAMM - DU Cycle
    SINA - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10
    DECK - DU Cycle
    ASKJ - DU Cycle - DU5
    GMAI - DU Cycle - DU5
    NVEC - DU Cycle - DU5
    LSCP - DU Cycle
    ANIK - DU Cycle

    SRVZ Wealth Lab Equations - Dry Up

    BAMM
    MKTW
    VSEC

    G33M4K Score for the above Stocks

    BAMM - 0
    MKTW - 1
    VSEC - 2

    Gallas2 "Keep an Eye on These" Stocks

    PETD (Attached)

    Dry Up Stocks with G33M4K Master List Score of Zero

    BAMM
    DECK
    HANS
    NAVR

    (VSEC, IDSA, HRT, LWAY, NVEC & NGPS have float outside normal parameters)

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=645742>
     
    #562     Dec 11, 2004
  3. Don't use an absolute float value. You should look at the ratio of average daily volume to the stock float and then sort by high ratios. Then you can participate in the liquid, as well as volatile, issues and eliminate the illiquid issues where the trade slippage is a higher percentage.
     
    #563     Dec 11, 2004
  4. Our system signaled two possible trades this morning: SINA & NVEC. Unfortunately, both stocks failed to meet the criteria necessary for trading. With SINA, we fail to see price improvement over the previous trading day. Although off the daily low, the current price for SINA trades down over two dollars at time of this post. NVEC has an average trading volume under our normal parameters, but 'close enough' to remain under consideration should it meet all additional criteria. Unfortunately, NVEC gapped up nearly 10% at this morning's open. Experience tells us that "large gap open" stocks - especially those of the 10% magnitude - more often than not fail to achieve our target gains, and frequently, result in losses. Therefore, we take no action in regards to NVEC.

    When observing our "Dry Up Stocks with a Master List Score of Zero," we see that volume remains light and well below previous day volume.

    Because our Watch List stocks failed to meet our criteria for taking on a trade, we take no action today.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #564     Dec 13, 2004
  5. johnc99

    johnc99

    Spydertrader, thanks for your help with TASR last week, you cleared up some confusion there I was having.

    I know you are not officially recording short trades for this journal, but would SINA have been a good short candidate this morning? Looked like MACD was negative and stochs were extrememly low when 25% prorata volume was exceed shortly after open. Also, depending how you draw the trendlines, it could have potentially penetrated an upward channel to the downside, although it may bounce off the 50MA. Hmm...

    Thanks for your insight -JohnC99
     
    • sina.jpg
      File size:
      50.2 KB
      Views:
      246
    #565     Dec 13, 2004
  6. To answer your question without appearing to use "hindsight" analysis requires we look at the fundamentals of the trade set up. You correctly observed that both MACD (-.2367) and The Stochastic Indicator (3.5576) indicated a strong downward trend at the time actual volume exceeded 25% pro-rata volume. According to my charts, price for SINA, when a 'short trade' signal appeared, was $34.24 (down nearly $1.50 from previous day). If we choose to look at shorting Hershey Stocks as needing the opposite set of criteria in place than taking a long position, then SINA does fit as a possible short trade today. Prior to entering long, determining an exit point becomes or next objective. Since the stock had already moved nearly 5% prior to the generation of our signal, we determine a MACD crossover exit might provide superior results, or you could hold until the end of the day to determine if volume levels reached FRV status. However, the best exit strategy for this trade would have been to target the 50-day moving average trendline as a point of resistance, and exited when price hit that level.

    It is important to note however, that the above strategy worked using 'pro-rata volume.' Waiting until actual Dry Up Volume levels had been reached would have placed us into the trade much too late. Also, a review of the posts regarding shorting Hershey Stocks indicates most short trades occur intraday, significantly less than our normal 4 day hold cycle.

    Again, the vast majority of posts written by Jack Hershey indicate The Hershey Equities Method trades with a 'long only' bias. However, your analysis of the 'short trade' set up with SINA followed the criteria perfectly.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #566     Dec 13, 2004
  7. Once again, I altered the settings at the stocktables.com web site in order to obtain the correct number of stocks: RS: 80 - EPS: 90

    Sevens - Ones - Zeros
    NGPS - SEM - AFFX
    LB - CKFR - ANT
    HOLX - TASR - DVA
    EEFT - BLL - URBN
    FARO - DRIV - CSE
    AMHC - MRVL - BKS
    MDRX - NIHD - CYTC
    ---- - HTCH
    ---- - PACT
    ---- - AMX

    Hotlist

    PACT
    NGPS
    TASR

    Watch List

    IDSA - DU Cycle
    ESMC - DU Cycle - Du5 - Du10 - Du20
    BCSI - DU Cycle - Du5
    TASR - DU Cycle
    CALM - DU Cycle - Du5 - Du10
    TRMM - DU Cycle
    SWIR - DU Cycle - Du5 - Du10
    ALDN - DU Cycle
    EVCI - DU Cycle - Du5
    NAVR - DU Cycle
    ENWV - DU Cycle
    GDP - DU Cycle
    HANS - DU Cycle
    BAMM - DU Cycle
    PETD - DU Cycle
    SMTS - DU Cycle - Du5
    ASKJ - DU Cycle
    LSCP - DU Cycle
    DPTR - DU Cycle
    ANIK - DU Cycle - Du5

    SRVZ Wealth Lab Equations - Dry Up

    BAMM
    ENWV
    TRMM
    VSEC

    G33M4K Score for the above Stocks

    BAMM - 3
    ENWV - 7
    TRMM - 6
    VSEC - 2

    Gallas2 "Keep an Eye on These" Stocks

    LSCP (Attached)

    Dry Up Stocks with G33M4K Master List Score of Zero

    TASR

    (VSEC, IDSA, HRT, LWAY, NVEC & NGPS have float outside normal parameters)

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=647492>
     
    #567     Dec 14, 2004
  8. The system generated one signal this morning as EVCI experienced an extremely large volume surge - even before the open. At nearly ten times the average daily volume, EVCI gapped up in price by 9.7% at the open. While both MACD and The Stochastic Indicator fell within desired parameters early during trading, gapping up by such a large amount prevented me from entering into a trade. Normally, the relatively lite average volume for EVCI would have eliminated it from consideration. However, with such a huge increase in volume today, I doubt the normal slippage penalty for purchasing thinly traded stocks would have applied. TASR continues to trade on lighter than normal volume, and continues to see a price reduction over the previous day. As a result, it does not appear as if we will take any action today in regards to entering into a long position. I plan to monitor the watch list for the remainder of the afternoon in case one of our equities makes a run at FRV status.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #568     Dec 14, 2004
  9. Once again, I altered the settings at the stocktables.com web site in order to obtain the correct number of stocks: RS: 80 - EPS: 90

    Sevens - Ones - Zeros
    XPRSA PACT - DHI
    DVA - DRIV - CKFR
    HOLX - SEM - CTSH
    SRDX - TASR - CYTC
    EEFT - FFIV - MDRX
    DHI - LNCR - ET
    URBN - MRVL - NIHD
    ---- - KSWS - AFFX
    ---- - AMHC
    ---- - YHOO

    Hotlist

    PACT
    TASR
    FFIV

    Watch List

    PACT - Du Cycle - DU5
    IDSA - Du Cycle - DU5 - DU10
    ESMC - Du Cycle - DU5
    BCSI - Du Cycle - DU5
    TASR - Du Cycle
    CALM - Du Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
    SWIR - Du Cycle - DU5
    FFIV - Du Cycle - DU5
    NAVR - Du Cycle
    ENWV - Du Cycle - DU5 - DU10 - DU20
    GDP - Du Cycle
    HANS - Du Cycle - DU5
    SINA - Du Cycle - DU5
    SMTS - Du Cycle - DU5 - DU10
    ASKJ - Du Cycle - DU5
    VSEC - Du Cycle
    NTES - Du Cycle - DU5 - DU10
    GMAI - Du Cycle - DU5
    LSCP - Du Cycle
    ANIK - Du Cycle

    SRVZ Wealth Lab Equations - Dry Up

    ENWV
    GMAI
    HANS

    G33M4K Score for the above Stocks

    ENWV - 4
    GMAI - 0
    HANS - 0

    Gallas2 "Keep an Eye on These" Stocks

    LIFC (Attached)

    Dry Up Stocks with G33M4K Master List Score of Zero

    ASKJ
    FFIV
    GMAI
    HANS
    LSCP
    SWIR
    TASR

    (VSEC, IDSA, HRT, LWAY, NVEC & NGPS have float outside normal parameters)

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=648405>
     
    #569     Dec 15, 2004
  10. The system generated another possible trade this morning as ENWV actual volume exceeded calculated Dry Up Volume just after the open. However, ENWV possesses several flaws preventing us from trading this signal. First, average daily volume on ENWV remains extremely low. Second, while MACD numbers (+.0452) looked good, The Stochastic Indicator (42.9877) failed to reach our desired level. As a result of our desire to avoid 'thinly traded' stocks and to only trade when certain levels of The Stochastic Indicator have been achieved, we take no action in regards to ENWV.

    A review of yesterday's run on EVCI yields an interesting observation. Had we actually taken on the trade when we received our signal, we would have reached our target goal of 10% gain. Although volume on EVCI exceeded a 20 fold increase over the average volume, today's volume appears to be more in line with normal levels. Even though a trade on EVCI would have provided us with profit, we had no way of knowing such high volume levels on EVCI would have materialized by the end of the day. As a result, I still feel the risk associated with thinly traded equities outweighs the apparent gain observed while reviewing EVCI.

    FFIV has made a run up in price this morning, but has done so on relatively low volume. We often see a similar behavior from HANS - where price increases on low volume, but falls on high volume.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #570     Dec 15, 2004
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.