Our system signaled three possible trades this morning based on pro-rata Dry Up Volume. BCSI triggered a signal based on the 25% pro-rata volume, and both FFIV and TASR triggered signals based on a 50% pro-rata volume. TASR failed to show price improvement over the previous day. While BCSI and FFIV both showed price improvement and positive MACD, The Stochastic Indicator remained at levels below our desired parameters. As a result, we take no action in respect to these three signals. - Spydertrader
http://tinyurl.com/5s5dr Smith Barney ups price targets for Juniper, F5, Lucent (FFIV, JNPR, LU, RDWR) By Tomi Kilgore "He lifted his price target for Juniper to $36 from $32.50, for FFIV to $60 from $45 and for Lucent to $4 from $3.75." Interstingly, price on FFIV has plummeted since the release of the above news item. Nice to see following our rules kept us out of this mess. - Spydertrader
We received no additional signals today other than those mentioned in a previous post. Even after the apparent positive news on F5 Networks, FFIV continues to plummet in price - down over $2.00 from the high of the day. As we continue to monitor both BAMM and TRMM from yesterday, we see continued price improvement on both stocks. As a result, both stocks hit and / or exceeded our normal 10% target price improvement. Again, we did not trade these two stocks (BAMM & TRMM). After developing a revised set of entry criteria, we have tracked these two stocks to determine if the revised entry criteria do indeed improve trading performance and profitability. Therefore, results for these two trades will not be included in the journal results regardless of trade outcome. At 12:12 PM this afternoon, an order for 425,000 shares crossed the time and sales sheets for FFIV. This order for FFIV, caused the total volume for today to exceed yesterday's volume (PDV). At the time this order was placed, price was $46.51. As expected price immediately began to increase. However, no price improvement over the previous day was shown at that time. As a result we took no action. A few minutes later, some 424,000 shares were removed from the daily volume total at a price .10 higher resulting in a volume drop back below the PDV. Price also followed suit lower. Although it appears volume will exceed the PDV shortly, price does not appear to be following at this time. In addition, MACD remains negative (-.01855) and The Stochastic Indicator holds at low levels (10.6123). Since all of our criteria have not been met for entry. We take no action on this trade based on a failure to meet all our revised entry criteria. I hope you find the above information useful. - Spydertrader
Backtesting in Wealth-lab, I got the picture that timestops (anywhere from 8-15 days - depends on the securities), with a breakeven stop (with a wide trigger), are better than trailing stops. Trailing stops (even when optimised) seem to reduce the average trade result, and profits. That is even with a 6% floor (no trailing stop until stock 6% in the black), and 60-70% tightness. A trailing stop set at an x day low, e.g. the low of the last 4 days, works better than a percentage trailing stop (logically, as it takes into account market behavior), but still worse than a straight time stop. A big caveat is that I used 20 CANSLIM stocks (over the last two years), so they were going up anyway (i.e. had strong relative strength). Are there any views or learnings from others on this topic? Thanks
Jack uses a method for stops he calls his "stop offset method." I have attached a copy of a document explaining Jack's Methods for your review. - Spydertrader
Thanks! That's a good document - rational system, and clearly explained Did Jack write this, or propose the concept and someone else summarised it? I thought I had read most of Jack's stuff but missed this. Thanks
I believe DKM wrote this document after listeing to Jack's teachings. If I recall correctly, others had proposed using Average True Range (plus a multiple of standard deviation) for stop offsets as well. - Spydertrader
Sevens - Ones - Zeros CMTL - EAGL - MRVL PPD - UNA - DRIV TRMM - UTHR - SINA ASPM - KSWS - ALDN CCRT - CTSH - HUM URBN - MTEX - PHS PHS - JUPM - CREE ---- - DECK - KFRC ---- - MRVL ---- - DPTR Hotlist TRMM ALDN JUPM SINA DECK Watch List IDSA - DU Cycle ESMC - DU Cycle LWAY - DU Cycle GMAI - DU Cycle HRT - DU Cycle SWIR - DU Cycle EVCI - DU Cycle - DU5 - DU10 ENWV - DU Cycle GDP - DU Cycle VSEC - DU Cycle NVEC - DU Cycle - DU5 ANIK - DU Cycle SRVZ Wealth Lab Equations - Dry Up ENWV GMAI MKTW G33M4K Score for the above Stocks ENWV - 4 GMAI - 6 MKTW - 1 Gallas2 "Keep an Eye on These" Stocks LIFC (Attached) Dry Up Stocks with G33M4K Master List Score of Zero ESMC GDP SWIR (VSEC, IDSA, HRT, LWAY, NVEC & NGPS have float outside normal parameters) <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=643480>
Hello Spydertrader. I've been following this journal with great interest the past couple of months and appreciate the time and effort you are putting into this. Great work! I have some questions regarding your dry up volume calculations. In a previous post you described the DU 5 calculation as the "lowest volume averaged 5 days before breakouts averaged over number of breakouts". For each breakout on a given chart, are you counting back 5 days from the beginning of the breakout and averaging each of the volumes in that 5 day period together, and then averaging those over the number of breakouts? Or are you just grabbing the lowest volume of each 5 day period and averaging that over the number of breakouts? The reason Iâm asking is because I have modified the wealth lab script you provided to calculate these (DU5,10 & 20) using the first method described above and am getting some extremely high numbers compared to what is arrived at by the original calculation you provided in the script (as well as dkmâs 30% of 65day avg volume). I think somehow Iâm not quite doing this correctly, any thoughts? Thanks for your help and keep up the good work.
The Wealth- Lab Chart Script located at the following URL: http://www.wealth-lab.com/cgi-bin/WealthLab.DLL/editsystem?id=32994 First looks to grab the peak volume associated with each upward run in price. Once peak volume has been determined (and corresponding high price bar for a particular cycle), the Chart Script counts backwards seeking the lowest volume bar within the specified period. The Chart Script then averages these low volume bars to return an average DU Volume. The best way to automate the additional equations used to calculate Dry Up Volume, is to look at Jack's original tc2000 equations (posted earlier in the Journal) and translate those into Wealth Lab Chart Script Code. SRVZ has done extensive work on this very subject and has posted his results earlier in the journal as well. While my version of Jack's Chart Script has produced results over the past year, it does have its limitations. I am by no means a Wealth Lab Expert and look forward to any improvements you might develop. Thanks for following the thread. - Spydertrader