Spydertrader's Jack Hershey Equities Journal II

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Spydertrader, Oct 4, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The above line I posted in error and corrected in a post several months later. I watch the %K line. The Green line (Default color settings in Quotetracker) is the %K and not the %D line. I apologize for any confusion created by my typo.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #2351     May 19, 2006
  2. gpzany

    gpzany

    Hi foible,

    CKCM triggered for me at 10:51 at 19.69 with a MACD = 0.179, Stoch = 62.11, LBDU trigger of 97495

    I did not take this trade due to the stoch not being above 80 and also Qcharts had reported 1 block trade of 14000 shares, which is approx 14% of LBDU.
     
    #2352     May 19, 2006
  3. Well I'm embarrassed to say I made a mistake this morning and purchased CNTF even though the Stochastics were only at 70. It was an error on my part. It looks like they are turning up now so I will just play it out and hope for the best.
     
    #2353     May 19, 2006
  4. gooch87

    gooch87

    I closed the remaining 60 shares when price crossed the lower channel for a wash on those shares. So I had a total 2.3% profit.

    I entered COGO this morning 100X14.15 and sold a few minutes later, 100X14.71 for a quick 2%.

    I entered TSFM 100X8.90 this was a premature trade. It may need another day to cure.

    Have a good weekend everyone.
    gooch87
     
    #2354     May 19, 2006
  5. foible

    foible

    It looks like in my keenness, I mis-read the stochastics. They're very much turned around by now, and I just got stopped out for a 2% loss with narry a twich in my direction.

    I did see the 14000 block trade, but as it was on the open (not uncommon to see a large consolidated print) and the volume increased steadily throughout the morning with several trades above 3000, I put this aside.


    Does anyone else think that this large block trade should have been a bigger concern? What about the large run-up in the first hour of trading (over .80!)?
     
    #2355     May 19, 2006
  6. gpzany

    gpzany

    The reason I don't enter these trades is that the large block trades can skew the entry signal by triggerring a barage of buying by traders who want to ride the coattales of this trade, if the bids keep moving higher. Then suddenly the buying dries up and the stock reverses and sells off....

    just my 2 cents worth...
     
    #2356     May 19, 2006
  7. After going back and reviewing the T & S for CKCM, I found the following block trade (attached). It appears your interpretation of the opening print resulted from a large pre-market trade, and not multiple orders at the open.

    - Spydertrader

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=1077278>
     
    • ckcm.jpg
      File size:
      9.1 KB
      Views:
      1,623
    #2357     May 19, 2006
  8. vladt

    vladt

    Hi, Can you please clarify which stoch. (14,1,3) do you use slow or fast?
    I use QuoteTracker and slow stoch at that time was around 60-65 and fast -82. On previous post Spydertrader said
    he use slow stoch.
    I have attached the CKCM chart.

    Thanks.
     
    #2358     May 19, 2006
  9. foible

    foible

    I'm using CyberTrader as a platform, and frustratingly, they don't support the full stochastic oscillator, so I've tried to rig my own from the %K and %D directly.

    For %K, I have a period of 14, and a slowing factor of 1. For %D I have a period1 of 14, period2 of 3, and a slowing factor of 1. This was an attempt to construct the Stoch(14,1,3). It is my understanding that the fast/slow difference refers to the slowing factor, which is the '1' in the full stochastic, so in this case, it would be a fast stochastic.

    When talking about a full stochastic, I haven't been able to find any documentation which refers to a slow or fast stochastic. Rather, it seems like you can emulate the slow or fast by varying the slowing factor (see the quote below).

    After watching Jack's videos, he says some things which confuse me a bit. He refers to the (14,1,3) stochastic as "slow", and the (5,2,3) or (5,3,3) as the "fast", even though it has a greater slowing factor and the online docs would call this a "slow stochastic".

    I might be way off base here, but I understood this to mean that, even though it is using a slow stochastic calculation, the period over which the calculation is performed is much smaller (5-period MA vs 14) and so it will respond much faster.

    What is your understanding?

    I should add that I made a mistake in my entry, and entered on the %D being >80, and not the %K as I should have. When I examine my notes on my entry & exit rules, I see that I had written that down, but didn't pay close enough attention when placing the trade.
     
    #2359     May 19, 2006
  10. foible

    foible

    Eyeballing your chart, your fast stoch looks a lot closer to the stoch that I used for entry. Thanks for the chart - I'll have to do some more tweaking.
     
    #2360     May 19, 2006
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.