My point exactly moron. Only the truly good traders on ET, and there are very few, dare to post their ideas in "trading". Obviously, you are not one of them.
You competition junkies are so funny. The market isn't enough, is it? Of course, after one of the most horrific calls, making the trade all about YOU and not really the markets, you fail to keep your word. No surprise, at all... But hey, do your ad hominem deal, it works on the small minded, who don't really want to deal with the obvious of your word having no value... p.s. So RM is a genious, and you are also the one who thinks Hitler is a genious...very funny.
Certainly. When people backtest, they rarely match reports to the charts. So why do it going forward. The system either works or it doesn't.
I cannot believe i've stumbled onto a bigger loser than bozente. What's wrong w you ZZloser? Are you still upset about the 2000 election vote count?
I bet when your computer gets shut off tonite, and you find yourself in your pathetic reality, there are no more "lol" 's. To the kids at home, what has happened to ZZloser is what will happen to you if u spend all your years upset about the 2000 election vote count.
Come on Pabst.....help me get more than my + 15 point target this time............. http://www.charthub.com/images/2006/10/05/ES_317_VB_10.png http://www.charthub.com/images/2006/10/05/ES_317_VB_11.png This was the official, "let's see if N Korea is dumb enough to test a nuke" SHORT swing trade.
I of course agree with you and riskarb. No two ways about it. But by the same token there's many systems that fail to account for the tremendous slippage in the aftermath of data. It's rarely a huge issue in the indices but Treasuries' and FX become hideously illiquid during payroll. Sometimes I'll see a tested system kick in a long 6 ticks into a one minute/30 tick bond rally and the reality is, he NEVER could have gotten that price.