SPX Credit Spread Trader

Discussion in 'Journals' started by El OchoCinco, May 17, 2005.

  1. It is all relative really. If I was doing SPX I would have looked to go below the low of 1218 and maybe look at 1210/1200 strikes and the equivalent credit would have to be double the ES quote.

    Remember ES is $50 a point and SPX is $100. So I woul dhave done 150 SPX spreads, not 300, for the same margin and therefore I would have needed $1.10 SPX credit to have something similar ($150,000 margin a strike or two outiside of the lows).

     
    #8281     Jul 5, 2006
  2. I had forgotten ES is $50 thanks..
     
    #8282     Jul 5, 2006
  3. Can anyone pls help with IB?

    Im trying to select the expiry date on Option Trader platform.

    For July, There is July 21 and also July 31. For Aug there is Aug 18 and Aug 31. So which is the correct expiry date for July and Aug?
     
    #8283     Jul 5, 2006
  4. rdemyan

    rdemyan

    Coach:

    If we can assume that because the ES is about 10 points higher than the SPX, then an equivalent trade on the SPX might have been the 1210/1200. Mid on that is $0.45.

    However, you're saying that $1.10 would be required to match your trade. If the equivalent trade assumption is correct, then this is a huge difference.

    I must be missing some things here, because if this is typical, why would anyone trade spreads on the SPX versus the ES? :confused:

     
    #8284     Jul 5, 2006
  5. 3rd Friday is traditional expiration.
    Other is 'end of month' expiration.

    Mark
     
    #8285     Jul 5, 2006
  6. july 21 is the regular option contracts, the 31's are the EOM's (end of month expiration)
     
    #8286     Jul 5, 2006
  7. So Im only concerned with July 21 and Aug 18 for my actual trading of ES options which is similar to SPX expiry dates? Sorry for newbie questions.
     
    #8287     Jul 5, 2006
  8. well that depends on whether you want to trade the regulars or the EOMs :) less liquidity in the EOMs so i suppose the regulars would be preferable.
     
    #8288     Jul 5, 2006
  9. #8289     Jul 5, 2006
  10. i think phil was refering to the absolute amount of the credit not the credit per contract. :)
     
    #8290     Jul 5, 2006