SPX Credit Spread Trader

Discussion in 'Journals' started by El OchoCinco, May 17, 2005.

  1. Slight typo in that formula for middle of the spread b/a:

    (Bid - Ask)/2 + BID

    Round up to nearest $0.05 when dividing by 2.

    Sorry about that.

    Once you have the middle you should shave anywhere from $0.05 to $0.20 depending on how wide the spread is. I have found lately that the wider the spread, the more I need to shave to get filled. There is no right answer here, really. Some people say that it is perhaps better to take the mid-point between the BID and the B/a Midpoint as a limit price. Not a bad approach either.

    Phil


     
    #711     Sep 15, 2005
  2.  
    #712     Sep 15, 2005
  3. skanan

    skanan

    Here is my take on this one.

    Suppose I open Iron butterfly at

    1195/1225/1255.
    b/a on 1225 is 19.5/20.2
    b/a on 1255 is 5.6/6.3
    b/a on 1195 is 7/8
    ba on 1225 is 14.5/16.1

    For ATM Iron butterfly 120/123/126, the b/a spread is the following
    120/123 0.85/1
    123/126 1.2/1.3
    Assume natural fill, the credit is 1.2+0.85=2.05
    Total 10 contracts $20.50

    I'll analyze risk/reward on SPX spread.

    Assume I get filled at natural point on everything (worst possible scenario). The credit I'd get for this is 19.5-6.3+14.5-8 = 19.7. So, I'm risking 11.3 to make 19.7. The reward/risk ratio is 19.7/11.3=1.74

    From TOS software, the probability of SPX expire between 1225/1255 is 50.7%.

    I don't see anything wrong with SPX in this case.

    So, can you please elaborate whether you don't like the instrument or you don't like the risk/reward ratio Coach Phil use.

    I'm not saying that SPX is perfect but I'd like to know if there are alternatives for it.

    Thanks,
    Nick

     
    #713     Sep 15, 2005
  4. ryank

    ryank

    How do you know you won't lose your job tomorrow? Most likely you won't, but you could. Your past experience says that you are doing your job well and that things are fine. Based on this you make large purchases such as a house, a car or other item where you take out a loan you can repay based on your future cash flow (i.e. you are taking a risk).

    Phil's past experience is that he will do 1-2 adjustments per year. He bases this on his past experience. He is taking a risk that he feels he can manage properly. Could the market crash tomorrow? Sure it could, but Phil has a plan, just as you would have a plan if you lost your job tomorrow.

    I know I am comparing a bit of apples to oranges with my silly example but my point is that it comes down to risk management. If you are doing "A" and something bad happens more often then expected then you do "B" (manage your risk) based on your past experiences. Life is full of woulda, coulda, shouldas. In the markets you take what it is giving you. As Phil said, if he is seeing that he is having to make more adjustments than usual he will stick to put spreads if the market keeps making strong moves up and vice versa.

    Phil always stresses to run your trading account like a business. Speaking as a business owner I would say his analysis is dead on, you put your capital to work for you where you can make the most profit with the least amount of risk.

    ryan
     
    #714     Sep 15, 2005
  5. The SPX closed today at 1227.73, but the opening price tomorrow is the settlement price.

    I've heard that the SPX can open on settlement day at a price quite different than the sum of the 500 components that constitute the SPX... i.e. the market maker is doing his thing.

    Question: is it possible to determine which way the market maker may "shift" the settlement day's opening by looking at all the strikes' open interest and volume?

    I've heard a 10 to 20 point gap is not uncommon.
     
    #715     Sep 15, 2005
  6. I do not know if I would go so far to say that the market makers can cause the SET to be different than the opening prices of all 500 stocks. The set is automatically calculated after all 500 stocks open and a market maker does not change the SET.

    The market could have a gap up or down at the opening which would cause the SET to be quite different than the closing index price on Thursday. This is why on a day like today you have to be careful if you are 10 points or under within the index at your short strikes. It is a witching day SET so it could be wild. last June the SET was 10 points higher than the last index closing price!

    Phil


     
    #716     Sep 15, 2005
  7. Don't forget that there is a rebalancing too. This should mostly be done already, but it can make a difference also.


    Cheers!

     
    #717     Sep 15, 2005
  8. rdemyan

    rdemyan

    Okay. So basically the midpoint is as I thought. If the credit spread b/a is 0.4/0.8 then the midpoint is 0.6.

    How about the natural. Using my previous example, what is the Natural.



     
    #718     Sep 15, 2005
  9. B5476

    B5476


    My understanding is "the natural" in your example would be 0.4 if you are selling and 0.8 if you are buying
     
    #719     Sep 15, 2005
  10. rdemyan

    rdemyan

    Phil:

    I've heard that the CBOE is planning to introduce a "quickie" or short-term SPX option at the end of October.

    I'm not sure what it is and I was wondering if you know anything about it.
     
    #720     Sep 16, 2005