SPX Credit Spread Trader

Discussion in 'Journals' started by El OchoCinco, May 17, 2005.

  1. nlslax

    nlslax

     
    #3691     Feb 5, 2006
  2. Hart9000

    Hart9000

    I was also at this class and found it very interesting. Tom was applying these guidelines to slower, tighter indexes like IWM. You would not use these guidelines on the SPX.

     
    #3692     Feb 6, 2006
  3. skanan

    skanan

    I trade one or two contracts almost every day. I don't pay $2.95 per contract. You can email support there and ask for comissions reduction. Don't tell them I told you.


     
    #3693     Feb 6, 2006
  4. WD40

    WD40

    can someone explain what do the following mean?

    *Go +/- 2% from the index
    *Take in 1/3 width of strike for your credit
    *Cover at 10% width of strikes
     
    #3694     Feb 6, 2006
  5. nlslax

    nlslax

    I've traded IC's on RUT before, much higher Beta than SPX. 3% is manageable w/SPX & SPY. A little too tight for RUT & IWM. I plan to place trades this week to test out Tom's strategy.
     
    #3695     Feb 6, 2006
  6. I've never thought of doing this before. Do I have to give up any of their nice little perks for this lower commission. I knew that they let you adopt a different company's commissions but you give up certain things.

    Also, I don't really worry about the $2.95/contract except for on my journal thread account. I don't suppose that they would let me get a reduction on the $1.50/contract on bigger orders? :D I know, I know.... Americans always want something for nothing.
     
    #3696     Feb 6, 2006
  7. To a certain extent I agree with ToS on their OTM spread opinions. This is evident from my journal thread. But I'm with optioncoach as far as SPX is concerned. SPX is well suited for deep OTM spreads. I've never been to ToS seminars or anything, but it sounds like they are solely counting on statistical probabilities. This only works with large accounts where you can spread out your money between 50 different positions. That is the only way you could possibly promote a set it and forget it strategy. (Hence the <2.5% allocation to each trade statement) As a slightly more experienced option trader, I think that actively managing 50+ positions at once is very difficult. I really try to stay under 15. I also think that passively managing a position that is only 2% OTM on an issue like SPX is insane. And if you are playing a tighter, slower issue then you wouldn't really get a great credit either. Just my opinion.
     
    #3697     Feb 6, 2006
  8. nlslax

    nlslax

    Cache - Can I have a link to your journal?
     
    #3698     Feb 6, 2006
  9. WD40

    WD40

    #3699     Feb 6, 2006
  10. WD40

    WD40

    #3700     Feb 6, 2006