SPX Credit Spread Trader

Discussion in 'Journals' started by El OchoCinco, May 17, 2005.

  1. dagnyt,

    You should realize that even if the number of contracts is the same, the risk is higher on the FOTM spread. Taking in less credit per spread results in higher margin requirements. By doing the same number of contracts you've effectively taken a position that risks more and gains less than a CTM position with the same size.

    Really though, size is irrelevant. A losing strategy loses regardless of size, and a winning one also does so regardless. Reducing the size doesn't increase your chances of winning in the long run. It only serves two purposes.

    1) Reduces your profit potential.
    2) Prevents a blowup.

    If you've found that you can make money consistently for 10 years with your strategy then it is a winning strategy. If you faced significant drawdowns during 3 sigma events, then it is a losing strategy and needs to be adjusted. I also do a further OTM credit spread on occasion, but not as a standalone position.

    I would suggest to anyone who might be uncertain about the ability to manage a CTM spread. It is much easier than managing an FOTM spread that has gone wrong.
     
    #12711     Jan 10, 2007
  2. All good stuff Cache. Thanks. Its refreshing to get level headed insight, knowledge and perspective devoid of the routine vanity, insults & superiority ego baggage that masquerades personal opinions as expert advise.

    I have started experimenting with CTM/ITM SPX debit spreads. I am doing pretty good in my TA and macro trend projections. Thus I tend to call direction and short term trends fairly well. Lately I have got some very fast full theoretical profit underlying runs - sometimes in as soon as a day or even in a few hours of putting on a position (10-15 point spreads). My problem though is that even when the underlying runs well past my shorts to hit the max profit zone I then must wait for the extrinsic value of the options to whither away in time before I can realize anything close to my full theoretical profit. The curvature that makes the position easily manageable when it goes against me works against me in giving up anything remotely close to max profit till close to expiration. Of course in that extended time frame my short term favorable directional projections can retreat and reverse and "undo" the profits before I can strip them.

    What in your opinion is the best way to lock full profit potential or extract the best profit one can in these kinds of CTM debit spread scenarios? My problem with putting on a butterfly around my shorts is that in a moderately trending market (that I have successfully projected/anticipated) it becomes a foot race between the directional trend rate vs the expiration schedule. That can eat a lot of profit if the trend races ahead of schedule. My inclination has been to buy back the shorts if volatility contracts significantly to let it run or to close the position at a major discount to full theoretical profit.

    Thoughts?

    TS
     
    #12712     Jan 11, 2007
  3. Cache,

    Did you meant that FOTM credit spread has a negative expectancy at the time of opening the trade? If thats the case, Can you long the vertical so to get a +ve expectancy?

    Do you think that expectancy (CTM) > expectancy (FOTM)? Or do you think that expectancy(CTM) is neural or slightly +ve? If we can't generalize it to every stock, I like to use SPX for our discussion.

    I always think the expectancy of every strategy is the same (almost zero). Otherwise you can devise a combo and receive a +ve expectancy.

    I wish your insight can refine my trading strategy.
     
    #12713     Jan 11, 2007
  4.  
    #12714     Jan 11, 2007
  5. i should really know this....does anyone know where i can chart an option (ie: spx put 1410) from its' inception to current, just as one can chart the underlying? no paid sites please. if this can be done in ib(am not adept with modeler), just acknowledge and i will try. thanks
     
    #12715     Jan 11, 2007
  6. piccon

    piccon

    Yip,

    My CTM has lost some ground today due to the huge ramp up. What I am happy about is that I closed both wings

    Yesterday I closed 810/820@0.10 and this morning I close 740/730@0.15

    So I need to concentrate on the CTM spreads For me to lose money on this trade We must have the following at Expiration:

    763 <RUT>797. So I will follow it the next couple days. With pratically 4 days left I don't want to close it right now for just 2K gain.

     
    #12716     Jan 11, 2007
  7. piccon,

    Can you show us how much you made with your OTM verticals, and how much premium is remaining for your CTM?

    Be careful about the pin risk. Several months ago, my short was close to the money (around 2 point difference, i forget the exact no), and i didn't close it because i didn't want to leave some money at the table. At Friday expiration day, it gapped up over 10 points, and i lost most of my profit that month, and it reversed immediately. There was no way i could do but to see my profit vaporized.

    As a trader, greed and fear are the emotion that we have to master.
     
    #12717     Jan 11, 2007
  8. piccon

    piccon

    My PUT wing gave me a net gain of 0.90 and the cal picks up 1.60 for a total of 2.50 about 7.9K. Right now I am up 2K on the CTM. I am ready to convert it into a butterfly by tomorrow.

    If I do it right now, I will be guaranted a break even on the CTM because I can get $3 for 790/780 PUT.

    But I am watching it.

     
    #12718     Jan 11, 2007
  9. What I mean is that almost every position you open has - exp because of slippage and commiss. Slippage is amplified the further OTM you go. That means greater -exp at the open. The -exp on the FOTM also grows faster with a quick adverse move. That is logical because an FOTM vertical is almost strickly a theta play. Movement is the enemy. The CTM version is more a delta play.

    But in answer to your question, no you can't create +exp by buying the spread instead.
     
    #12719     Jan 11, 2007
  10. gulp.

    I could not resist the sudden upsurge action in SPX to pick up just a few credit spreads to the upside that I have had a bear of a time getting filled for weeks. I had to go less far out to find trading volume than I would have liked to get a reasonable premium for remaining front month trading days. But I went light on the number of contracts so this one ain't gonna bust the bank if it sours. But we are starting to get some up gapping that is intriguing. Could be an interesting run toward expiration week...

    SPX Jan CALL 1445/1455 net credit .45
    Risk $10,000
    Possible return on Margin: 4.5%

    The one thing I am worried about is the unwinding effect near expiration of all the puts being traded. That could push SPX up rapidly. Otherwise I think the sentiment is changing relative to FED action and expectation for interest rate cut looks like its reverting back to a possible hike. I am hoping that the market goes side-ways from here to consider possibilities. But then we have window dressing starting about now and the start of earnings season. Could be an interesting next few weeks...

    TS
     
    #12720     Jan 11, 2007