Typical liberal crybaby. Provoke others that don't submit to your demands and then whine about it when you get a response you deserve.
Prove that you are malicious? That you are antagonistic? That you are a whiner by asking the moderator to take action on your behalf for a response to your provocations that was long overdue? In the real world - there are consequences for your words and actions.
Maverick74: Sorry, I was not talking about anyone in particular. I was just making a point. If you work for a bank and make a bunch of money, in most cases the trader is on a salary and gets a discretionary bonus that is peanuts to what they made. And they give them some crap about losing money in another space. After this happens once or twice the guy will usually look to get backed by a smaller private firm that will give them a contract with a percentage deal. You might be right about Andrew Hall
Quote from JoePaterno: CLEAR QUESTION TO BONE: Is your own personal trading --- seriously profitable (like, dozens of % per annum) --- are your trading metrics high (Sharpe, expectancy, drawdowns) --- and has this been true for the last 5+ years? And if not, can you explain why anyone should sign up for your "professorship"? FLAMES from bone: You got your ass kicked by Alabama, so I understand the red ass. Would it be possible, in your two years and 200 ++ posts, to be anything but a bitch? For once, please extrapolate on a trading idea. Observers: please search his posts: he's a bitch. a bomb-thrower. he likes to call out spammers. Anybody... search his posts for one small kernel of trading knowledge or at least a baseline factoid. Joe, you know dick about trading. Big D (as he's affectionately known to TJ): Unprovoked, out of nowhere, you decide to attack me on a personal basis. A thread lays dormant for days, and then, TJ is not available so you start hitting on me? Quote from JoePaterno: Now compare to my previous post The pattern: Someone asks for proof Some people "think" he is profitable or "speaks the right words." Bone insults, becomes profane, evasive or very quiet. Sometimes, apparent shills pipe up also in defense. Notice again, the pattern? Cannot prove, but constantly points to relatively unverifiable nonproof ("see my references").