Spread The Wealth For Idiots - Defined

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TT1, Oct 28, 2008.

  1. TGregg

    TGregg

    Iceman is well noted for listing many good things about people he doesn't agree with. Just look at all the nice things he's said about me. :D
     
    #111     Oct 31, 2008
  2. Gord

    Gord

    Yes I have experienced his compliments as well... [​IMG]
     
    #112     Oct 31, 2008
  3. I seriously think Iceman has some type of rage disorder. Every time he addresses someone who disagrees with him he tells them they have mental disorders, to leave the country or to just go fuck themselves. The dude is emotionally chaotic and erratic.
     
    #113     Oct 31, 2008
  4. Gord

    Gord

    Really? I hadn't noticed anything different about him - seems like a typical liberal to me... [​IMG]
     
    #114     Oct 31, 2008
  5.  
    #115     Nov 1, 2008
  6.  
    #116     Nov 1, 2008
  7. I'm sorry, but in this case your facts are illogical. If you review your chart carefully, you'll see that it doesn't provide the necessary facts to prove your point.
     
    #117     Nov 1, 2008
  8. calling anyone in US politics at a Federal level a "radical" or "conservative" is a pretty good joke.

    recently i spoke with a friend who is a naturalized US citizen (work>h1b) and asked him about the prospect of voting for the 1st time.

    his respose was that it was not worth the time to get voter registration, because the choices were to pay now or pay later.

    meaning that republicans would tax less but spend just as much and cause future inflation etc; or the dems would tax more right now.

    also, since i just read through all the 20 pages, i'm curious where does everyone think this redistributed money will go?

    say i make 100 right now and get taxed 10. then, next year, i get taxed 15 instead so that some "poor" chump can get 4 more food stamps? will he actually spend the money and drive up Cosco's sales and stock price, or will he use to start a fire to burn a US flag?

    lastly, if my "savings/aset" rate-ratio was 30 anyway, will this affect my rate of consumption - e.g. will i ejoy less "life" because of this extra setback. which i plan on making back again when my Cosco investment pays off. less the "governament" adminstration/transaction fees?
     
    #118     Nov 1, 2008
  9. Yannis

    Yannis

    Of course, the fact that you are not just responding to my post with your thoughts but feel obliged to first print insults, from the safety of your anonymity, against someone you disagree with, but whom you don't know and will never see, speaks volumes... You need help, man, really! :(
     
    #119     Nov 1, 2008
  10. Yannis

    Yannis

    Obama's Wealth Redistribution Agenda: Democrats Target Your 401k Retirement Plan with Taxes
    by the Republican Majority Campaign


    "Dear Fellow American:

    The public outcry of real Americans like you and Joe the Plumber is finally getting some light shed on Mr. Obama's wealth redistribution agenda supported by Socialist Democrats in Congress. The corrupt media can't hide it any longer. The plan is to bring an end to the America we know and love; to bring an end to freedom and liberty.

    They want total control of what you see, hear, think, and do. They will stop at nothing. NOW, they are aiming at your 401k retirement plan and they are going for the kill.

    Yes that's right, Liberals in government want to seize these assets for their own. Just look at what James Pethokoukis, the money and politics blogger for U.S. News & World Report has said,

    In place of 401(k) plans, she would have workers transfer their dough into government-created "guaranteed retirement accounts" for every worker. The government would deposit $600 (inflation indexed) every year into the GRAs. Each worker would also have to save 5 percent of pay into the accounts, to which the government would pay a measly 3 percent return. Rep. Jim McDermott, a Democrat from Washington and chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee's Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support, said that since "the savings rate isn't going up for the investment of $80 billion [in 401(k) tax breaks], we have to start to think about whether or not we want to continue to invest that $80 billion for a policy that's not generating what we now say it should."

    Straight from the jackasses mouth, the Democratic plan is to SIEZE your 401k and take $80 billion that is currently the property of American citizens. Effectively, this plan will end all of the incentives that the majority of Americans not only enjoy but rely on. I am sure you or someone you know takes advantage of their employer matching their 401k contribution. Under the iron fist of the Democratic empire your employer would no longer receive a tax benefit for matching your contribution, so they won't do it. And you will lose half of your retirement contributions. And don't forget, that you will lose your tax breaks from the 401k plan also, so you'd be paying the government to let you retire. Sounds like fun?
    ...
    Obama has always been against an individuals' right to control and spend their own savings. He has a narrow, selfish and myopic view of the world we live in and the idea that he can tax whatever he wants to whenever he wants to."
     
    #120     Nov 2, 2008