Spitzer: Federal Reserve is ‘a Ponzi scheme, an inside job’

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by monty21, Jul 26, 2009.

  1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIA055kYVyM


    The Federal Reserve — the quasi-autonomous body that controls the US’s money supply — is a “Ponzi scheme” that created “bubble after bubble” in the US economy and needs to be held accountable for its actions, says Eliot Spitzer, the former governor and attorney-general of New York.

    In a wide-ranging discussion of the bank bailouts on MSNBC’s Morning Meeting, host Dylan Ratigan described the process by which the Federal Reserve exchanged $13.9 trillion of bad bank debt for cash that it gave to the struggling banks.

    Spitzer — who built a reputation as “the Sheriff of Wall Street” for his zealous prosecutions of corporate crime as New York’s attorney-general and then resigned as the state’s governor over revelations he had paid for prostitutes — seemed to agree with Ratigan that the bank bailout amounts to “America’s greatest theft and cover-up ever.”

    Advocating in favor of a House bill to audit the Federal Reserve, Spitzer said: “The Federal Reserve has benefited for decades from the notion that it is quasi-autonomous, it’s supposed to be independent. Let me tell you a dirty secret: The Fed has done an absolutely disastrous job since [former Fed Chairman] Paul Volcker left.

    “The reality is the Fed has blown it. Time and time again, they blew it. Bubble after bubble, they failed to understand what they were doing to the economy.

    “The most poignant example for me is the AIG bailout, where they gave tens of billions of dollars that went right through — conduit payments — to the investment banks that are now solvent. We [taxpayers] didn’t get stock in those banks, they didn’t ask what was going on — this begs and cries out for hard, tough examination.

    “You look at the governing structure of the New York [Federal Reserve], it was run by the very banks that got the money. This is a Ponzi scheme, an inside job. It is outrageous, it is time for Congress to say enough of this. And to give them more power now is crazy.

    “The Fed needs to be examined carefully.”

    Spitzer resigned as governor of New York in March, 2008, after news reports stated he had paid for a $1,000-an-hour New York City call girl.

    At the time, Spitzer had been raising the alarm about sub-prime mortgages. In the wake of the economic meltdown triggered last fall by sub-prime loans, some observers have suggested that Spitzer may have been targeted by law enforcement because of his high-profile opposition to Wall Street financial policies.

    Investigative reporter Greg Palast wrote that federal agents’ revealing of Spitzer’s identity as a call-girl customer was no coincidence.

    Palast wrote that the principle of “prosecutorial discretion” is often used to keep the names of high-profile persons out of the media when they are tangentially linked to a criminal investigation. In the case of Spitzer, the Justice Department chose not to invoke prosecutorial discretion.

    Funny thing, this ‘discretion.’ For example, Senator David Vitter, Republican of Louisiana, paid Washington DC prostitutes to put him in diapers (ewww!), yet the Senator was not exposed by the US prosecutors busting the pimp-ring that pampered him.

    Naming and shaming and ruining Spitzer – rarely done in these cases - was made at the ‘discretion’ of Bush’s Justice Department.

    Spitzer recently told Bloomberg News that President Obama’s regulatory reforms of the financial sector are “irrelevant” because regulatory agencies have not been enforcing corporate laws to begin with.

    “Regulatory agencies already had the power to do everything they needed to do,” he said. “They just affirmatively chose not to do it.”
  2. new$


    Never happen till sheeple elect congressmen who care and Wall/Washington know it.
  3. Question is, does Barney Frank have the power to stop Ron Paul's bill to audit the Fed?
    Last I checked, 276 in the House were signed on as Co-Sponsors of the bill.
    Go Ron Go!
  4. I'm a huge supporter of Ron Paul.

    I'm quite worried about Senate approving Paul's legislation though.
  5. I'm really surprised that this thread is not getting any attention on ET... Spitzer's comments on the FED is a huge deal.

    More importantly, I'm shocked that the mainstream media is not discussing this. Well, maybe "shocked" is the wrong word. I'm sure the "elite" bankers don't want to get this opinion out. Even though Spitzer messed up huge with the prostitution sting, he is the hound of Wall Street.

    Schumer is trying to curb front-running by high frequency traders, and that is getting a lot of press. Surprisingly Spitzer's comment has been silenced.
  6. If Marv Albert can come back after wearing women's panties and asking his friend to "bring Bubba because he resembled a horse", Spitzer will be fine. His comments on the Fed are very strong.
  7. Was Marv talking about Bill Clinton?:D

    I'm also surprised this thread is so quiet. Eliot's comments are not only true, but rather bombastic for a guy who held such high office.
  8. Right. Because bubbles didn't happen in the US before the Fed was created.

    He sounds like someone searching for a new career, frankly.
  9. Only dumb Americans can force a state governor to resign over screwing some chick. The rest of the world really has a laugh on that one!
  10. Bubbles didn't occur EVERY decade before the FED... essentially because the money supply went out of whack.

    Historical bubbles were driven by rampant speculation (think tulips in the Netherlands) and didn't have to do as a result of government interference/manipulation in the economy.
    #10     Jul 27, 2009