"We know" is an assertion that arrogates you, a mere man, to the level of the most powerful Being that exists, by whatever name you wish to call it. So I think you are being a little hypocritical. As a man, you only have what's called faith and drama. But that's for another forum. I get political opinion from both atheists, as well theists, even self described Christians. Styx was briefly some kind of Christian, then became a self described satanist, and now is a self described nothing, somewhere between agnostic and atheist. I don't pay attention to any of Styx opinions on "the occult", as I am the master in that area. It takes years, even several lifetimes to come near my level of understanding. Styx has some ways to go to even be a student of mine, but so far as I've heard, no, he doesn't consider himself any kind of god, and I have my own opinions on what 666 means, if anything. Btw, the "beast" is anything that can be numbered. Anything that can be numbered has a difference which sets it apart, and/or makes it special compared to anything else. That's the beast. A beast is thought to be animalistic, which people certainly are, but can also describe a difficult mental quandary. I use Styx for his special quality of erudite speech. Saves me a lot of time expressing similar political points. I appreciate the low levels of cognitive dissonance.
Oh wait, maybe I'm the one that should apologize. It's been so long. I admit Trump did brag about cornering one of his secretaries in a hallway and pinning her up against the wall. Then Trump bragged about forcing her legs open with his knee and telling her he wants to fuck her. Then Trump bragged about when she turned him down, he shoved his hand down her skirt and finger fucked her. Then he bragged about waving that finger in front of her face and said, "You mean nothing to me". So, even though Biden explained privately to a buddy what women will welcome from alpha males who have both money and celebrity, what Trump bragged about, publicly, was a lot worse. I apologize, it's been a long time, and I'm ashamed of what Trump did to his secretary in the hall way.
Trump wants the DOJ (i.e. the taxpayers) to pay for his "special master". Trump’s request for DOJ to split the bill for his special master ridiculed by legal experts https://www.rawstory.com/special-master-trump-2658173756/ Donald Trump's attorney's suggested that the Department of Justice pay for half of the cost of a special master which prosecutors have made clear they oppose. In a Friday evening court filings before controversial Judge Aileen Cannon, Trump's defense team submitted a proposed order for a special master to oversee the documents the FBI seized at Mar-a-Lago. "Each party will bear 50% of the professional fees and expenses of the Special Master and any professionals, support staff, and expert consultants engaged at the [special] master’s request," Trump's team suggested. DOJ disagreed, writing that Trump, "as the party who requested the Special Master, will bear 100% of the professional fees and expenses of the Special Master and any professionals, support staff, and expert consultants engaged at the Master’s request." Former Assistant Attorney General Elliot Williams explained, "This is one of those facts people might not realize about the process -- someone has to pay for the special master! DOJ being (justifiably) snippy here by saying -- why are you asking us to pay for something that (a) we don't need and (b) only you want?" Jan Wolfe, a legal affairs reporter at The Wall Street Journal noted, "One of the candidates charged $700 an hour in 2018." Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade said, "This sounds a lot like Mexico will pay for the wall."
Jesus fucking Christ. Even when the guy gets it his way he wants to be a greedy pig to be slaughtered.
Here on earth, us mere mortals both man and woman, there are facts and opinions of fact. "We know" refers to documented, verifiable facts that can be admissible in a court of law. The reference is based on actual documents filed with the court. Your belief and blind faith in a magical being makes no difference to the above other than as an oath to be truthful for sworn testimony. One can also not use the bible to provide an oath to be truthful in a court of law. The cognitive dissonance in your replies are a demonstration that you do not understand the term. For someone who claims to derive their opinions from multiple sources in the informational spectrum, you have demonstrated a repeated reposting of a bath-robed self-proclaimed God posing as an authority to topics they clearly do not understand and whom also promotes mis-characterization of verifiable facts. It's humorous that you project your hypocrisy on others while claiming to have a deeper understanding of the universe when you can't even acknowledge nor distinguish facts from opinions. Standards of Weights and Measures is a good place to start to understand what is a fact distinct from an opinion.
Oops i apologize. Are you saying Biden was the one who pinned a secretary up against a wall, and when she refused to fuck, he finger fucked her, waved the finger in front her face, and said, "You mean nothing to me"? And it was Trump who was privately explaining/bragging that some women are so turned on by money and celebrity that they would welcome an alpha male to grab them anywhere as a greeting, instead of a handshake?
Earth? What is that? All the world is a stage, and we, men and women, are merely players. That was Shakespeare. I say that man is a manifestation of magic by the fiat of faith, appearing only to the faithful, and only appearing as long as said faith/fiat can be maintained. It is maintained largely by the ability of the minutia of details to grab and hold attention. Politics remains one of the more potent arresters of attention, just as it was in Shakespeare's day. As a man, YOU are the magical being, not more real than a unicorn to the Being which Knows All and Believes Nothing. As such, you have the experience of drama, just as Shakespeare affirmed. As such, you are a derivative of That Which Knows, far removed from actual knowing, and as faulty in judgment as the judgement/logic that incepts the experience of the drama. So here you're cognitive dissonance shows obvious. Nothing in a document filed with a court, which has not been litigated yet, can be said to be known. It might be verifiable, in court, but has yet to be verified by any kind of litigation. You have equated a claim, by the FBI, submitted to court, as what is known. As such, you equate the FBI to the great, All Knowing Being sometimes called "God", but which i call Good. So me thinks again you are a little hypocritical. I just showed how you are conflating knowledge, what "we know", with claims the FBI has made in a court filing. That's cognitive dissonance. I would challenge you to select anything Styx has "mischaracterized", and, characterize it your own way, and we'll see who has more credibility. Meanwhile, you're credibility is running low due to the conflation of claims in a filing with what "we know", which, if we did, we would practically be gods. I have other sources, but Styx has been quick to the draw, and very on point in much more detail than you will find on your average MSNDNC pony show. Styx opines from Holland, where he lives with his hot wife and new baby child, reporting from one of the rooms in the house. Sometimes he reports in his robe, drinking tea. His listeners have become known as "clankers" in reference to the clank of the teaspoon stirring in the tea cup. This is where reporting is heading in the future. Do you still need your reporters to look like FBI agents with suit and tie and nice hair? Above i included the image of typical, average FBI agent. This is what a person needs to look like for you to listen to their opinion? Anyway, i have not seen anywhere Styx has called the magical existence of humanity the reality of any kind of God. Can you point to any examples? Still waiting for an example of hypocrisy. I do have a deeper understanding of the universe, but anyone who has gotten an A in Business Law in Community College can tell you more about the difference between facts and opinions, which you have conflated.
I'm not subscribed to Truth Social, yet, so i don't know what exactly he has been saying about the FBI witch-hunt-drag-net-fishing-expedition. So far it sounds like the cache of documents the FBI stole, er, grabbed, is an eclectic variety of specie. There were many conversations, letters, actions leading up to this where documents were exchanged. As such, a number of the above statements could be true. "They messed up Barron's wardrobe" is one of the nicer things to say. They had the opportunity to plant bugs and drugs in Barron's wardrobe. You think they didn't because the typical average FBI agent looks like this: [image: typical FBI agent. Nice hair, suit] Despite how nice the average FBI agent looks, they have lost enough credibility that they will need special master oversight before this case can even get started. Till then, they will press with the court of public opinion to put a thumb on the next couple of major elections.