They arrested Stone the way they did because that's how they arrest gun owners who threaten civil war.
The Kohler Declaration; It'll be interesting to see what Cannon decides and whether she herself has been compromised.
No i'm a lot like British Royalty, i don't really have a position in politics. I would call my role more observational, rather than involved, like you: embroiled with excessive emotions of hatred, combined with the conceit of believing you know things. I only wish to see a fair fight, free of cognitive dissonance, special favors, and hypocrisy... and the arrogance of asserting knowledge of things merely believed. I see you caught up in mob group think, pretending to be free thinking. But every mob has a leader. It might not be Joe Biden, but someone is directing the narrative, and you are merely a follower. Reality is best discussed in Religion and Spirituality. Meanwhile, priest-craft and state-craft meet on the common ground of an effort to frame faith structures with references to reality, to somehow gain authority by association (with reality). Right now, try to focus your emotions just on this one topic, an FBI raid on an ex-President's home, to seize exactly what, we still don't know. It remains to be seen whether this was a reasonable search and seizure, or an unreasonable, against the Fourth Amendment. State then, for the record, what is the alleged "reality" in regards this raid? If you were honest, you'd admit it is all speculation at the moment. The fact that it is supposedly about classified documents makes it even more opaque. We can't know what is in the documents, and right now, don't know the legal status of them. We also don't know what Trump was doing with them. So, let's hear what you have to assert as facts, which may turn out to be speculative opinions, or malicious rumors, so we can see what Kool-aide you've drunken, and at whose hands (which mob are you following, and it's opaque director of narrative). Fact is, right now, nobody has anything on Trump in regards the FBI raid on his property. The other fact is, the FBI has prior shown itself to be like a bull in a china shop in regards raids, and so, does appear to be motivated by politics, greed, and/or personal preservation. I'm saying the FBI has NUMEROUS transgressions on it's record already, more transgressions, and more serious transgressions than does Trump. When it comes to raids, they grab what they can, even beyond their warrants, and assign a team of lawyers (at taxpayer expense) to keep what they have grabbed, feeling quite comfortable that they will never be successfully counter-sued. In this case, are merely trying to get leverage to dissuade Trump from running in 2024, or having influence in 2020. They have their own team of lawyers, who will be punching down on Trump and his lawyers, who will be representing 81 millions of people who are concerned about the Fourth Amendment. Name an action that is public knowledge that defames Trump. Name an action that is public knowledge that defames the FBI.
Trump’s narratives so far; - it’s a hoax - there were no documents - the FBI planted the documents - I declassified all the documents - the documents were nothing important - it was just mementos - I was writing a memoir - I gave all the documents back - the removalists did it - there were no nuclear secrets - Obama did the same thing - Hillary did the same thing - they messed up Melania’s wardrobe - they messed up Barron’s wardrobe - it was for my presidential library - all they had to do was ask - I took my work documents home - it’s Mark Meadows fault - Mar a Lago is more secure than Nat Arch - I stole the documents to protect them!
I don't suppose it's occurred to you that getting caught red handed with stolen goods tends to be "defaming". Of course getting indicted is also defaming, and getting convicted and hauled to jail is even more defaming. It seems Donald may have a lot more defaming to look forward to. You, however, seem to be much more concerned about Donald being defamed than Donald himself is. If Donald were concerned about it, he wouldn't have publicly bragged about grabbing women by their pussies, would he? And what does it say about you that you would persist in defending the indefensible with ridiculous arguments, even after the thief's own admission that he had classified government documents in his possession? You are concerned about an admitted thief being defamed. What does that say about your judgement? You're in a self-created hole; it is time to stop digging.
Speaking of Lawyers,.. Would you be willing to give an answer to the rhetorical question posed by this woman?
This guy has no idea what he is going on about. There are so many factual inaccuracies in his monologue, it's just a lost cause if you think he has any sort of credibility. But hey, at least you have an imaginary direct line to God.
We know exactly what the executive branch of the government was looking for, the timeline of negotiations for their return, the stalling of Team Trump as well as a detailed inventory of what was found and where it was found and what it was found with. You might not know, since you seem to enjoy getting your scoops from a dude whom proclaims to be God, has 666 in his avi and produces youtube vids dressed in bathrobes at his kitchen table.
You can't even get your facts straight. That was Joe Biden who bragged about how he could grab whatever he wanted. If I recall (was a long time ago), Biden was speaking privately (not publicly) about the effects of money and celebrity on women and how they will welcome extremely aggressive alpha male behavior. So you're wrong and should apologize.