The growth rate of the world population had peaked around 1963 while the overall global population is expected to grow another 2 billion from 8 billion to about 10 billion by 2050. DEPOPULATION will only occur if there is a global World War although science fiction cult believes it will occur from outbursts of infectious disease, famine, or by long-term trends, for example, sub-replacement fertility, persistently low birth rates, high mortality rates, and continued emigration. How do countries typically fight a decline in their population ? Immigration On that note - Huge economic & political problems south of the border. The poverty level is off the map…people trying to escape to the nearest country with a better lifestyle. America is not the only country with an influx of immigrants. In my opinion if countries turn their backs on immigrants…it will create a DEPOPULATION crisis. Regardless, immigration problems is not a fixable problem although politicians love to exploit the issue since the late 1800s when America needed immigrants to grow and then the immigration laws became very selective (discriminatory) in the 1920s. As it tried to increase certain ethnic groups while trying to decrease other ethnic groups but World War I&II created an immigration mess for America and everybody else as populations shifted (migrated & immigrated) especially after the global financial collapse of the great depression. wrbtrader
You're talking about a *natural* world. WEF is NOT natural. Do a deep dive into what their objective is then look at what's happening around the world. Their plans may get derailed with the right president (Trump, Vivek, RFKjr, ?) which is why they'll do anything, including starting WW3 to prevent someone in power to derail their plans. THAT'S why the threat is so real. I almost wish Trump would drop out as it would reduce the threat of WW3. If he gets in it may also derail the plans buy I'm not so sure I trust him. He doesn't seem to talk too negatively about Schwab/WEF despite all his talk. Admittedly, I don't listen to his speeches so just get small bits on social media.
Evil people (WEF, WHO, etc..) have been trying to get complete control of us for decades. This video makes a person wonder if the chemtrails that contain aluminum is meant to contaminate as many as possible then use the 5G wireless technology to control us. Pure speculation on my part. https://x.com/bambkb/status/1741843383532888536?s=20
Thread: https://x.com/MdBreathe/status/1741842844506017851?s=20 ***BTW, does anyone know why my new computer only posts the links without any images?
Sorry, the conspiracy theories involving depopulation/WEF does not fly considering the global population is still forever expanding even with a declining or low growth rate that peaked in 1963. What makes sense is that our carbon footprint demands on our planet, pollution of our oceans, disappearing glaciers, deforestation, climate change, growing crime rate, increasing mass shootings, and the economic costs of it all to global economies… It is too much of a negative impact on our planet, humans and life. The demand has grown so much that we now create animal breeding farms to feed our growing food demands…that in itself increases the risk of disease that can pass to humans because breeding farms is not a natural process. All the above increases the immigration from one country to another even if that other country does not want more immigrants. We’re destroying the planet by the increasing population. Our carbon footprint is way too much right now as the planet becomes more overcrowded because humans loves to fuck in an effort to pass on our genes because our genes is our immortality. wrbtrader
Apparently you think Dennis Rancort doesn't know what he's talking about then. CO2 is a whopping .04% of the atmosphere. As he said, even if we double the amount it may not affect the climate. There are plenty other scientists that agree climate change is a hoax. Most that push the hoax are politicians or people that have something to gain from pushing the agenda.
wrbtrader[/QUOTE] Meant to say that we’re destroying the planet by the increasing population that is treating the planet and fellow humans…poorly. Soon we will be growing babies in fertile incubators because of the need to pass on our genes…our way to manufacture a human breeding farm. Countries that become overpopulated…they increase the risk of claiming land from nearby countries…increasing the risk of WAR. wrbtrader
I have travelled the world and lived in many different climates from Hot to Cold… I have seen climate change with my own two eyes, seen climate/land maps from the 1960s in comparison to the climate/land maps today of the same regions/countries. The changes are horrific in some countries that it impacted the population so much…its the root cause of migration of people from one area to another area in the same country or increasing immigration from one country to a neighbouring country. Climate change is very real and a natural process of our planet although humans are speeding up that change. This summer I took a vacation with my teenagers…I showed them a favourite fishing/swimming place from my youth. Today, it’s an empty crater as one of my teens described it. Global temperatures will continue to rise. The natural result is more deaths, more infertility, more migration/immigration, and more WARS. Heck, there are areas in the U.S. that would only get 1 to 2 tornadoes per year are now getting 5 to 12 tornadoes per year with increasing power. Our thirst for land…people are more willing to build in flood plains, build further into the forrest where wildfires occurrences are increasing and more rural land being used to build more suburbans…resulting in less agriculture food source and higher food prices. Yet technology (developing new technology) will be used so that the population can continue to grow and get older…it is an ugly vicious cycle. wrbtrader
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1741914296131702803?s=20 ***BTW, you're not an expert & neither am I in vaccines, climate change, etc... Most of the information I provided was from very experienced people in the medical field. You weren't able to name a single prominent doctor that supports the jabs. Please provide a scientist that supports the climate change narrative. Please someone that isn't benefitting from the agenda. You probably follow *scientists* like Greta Thunberg, John Kerry, etc... ?