You were wrong about Covid throughout often to comical degrees. You've even posted charts that prove the exact opposite of what you thought they said ( axis seem to confuse you ). Luckily for you your ignorance saves you from actually realizing your theories are a complete crock of shit.
I have provided you with examples in the past. You predictably avoided being accountable for them. I don't even know if you have the intellectual ability to understand the data or what happened. So no, I'm not going to do that work for you. You seriously underestimate how many of us view you and your dumb ideas on this site. You can buddy up with your new Trump cult pals or your anti-vaxxer friends all you want it just makes you look even more ignorant. No surprise you are on this thread on the wrong side of the argument. OP is a nut.
Ok, show me the links where you supposedly provided me examples in the past. The truth is that you can't provide specifics, you just sling feces. You're a bitter, old pissy little man-Karen from the north who is resentful that things aren't shaping up to your progressive utopia. How's that for feces slinging? I mean if we're going to trade insults, that's ok too. But if you're going to make the claim that you showed me how I couldn't read charts or they were saying the opposite of what I claimed, then you need to show the proof. Otherwise we'll just sling insults - either is fine by me. Your call.
icandecide.org/v-safe This is government data from the v-safe program. If you find it questionable, please provide a better data source. It shows clearly that the vaccine caused a need for medical intervention in 7.9% of all vaccinated individuals. It had a negative impact of some kind in 1/3 of all vaccinated individuals. Pro-vaxxers can say whatever they want, but if they refuse to address this top-quality data set, their opinion is NULL & VOID. Just to address the objections of this being put up by Del Bigtree - it makes no difference. The data is freely available for download. Verify it yourself if you don't trust the person who posted it. The ultimate source is V-Safe, a government program for tracking Vaccine adverse events. It's not open to the public for obvious reasons, but they pulled the data through a FOIA remit.
ICAN is a notorious anti-vax website which regularly shovels fabricated and misrepresented data. They are merely doing it once again.
Like I said - this is V-Safe data, and that can be verified by you - if you wish. So, if you want to ACTUALLY refute something, then pull the data and show how it's wrong. It's ALL available. It's open. Which you won't do, cuz you can't. Cuz it's real data from the government and it shows the vaxes are damaging, just like this study from Yale:
If you pull the data you will discover that this website is completely misrepresenting it. This crappy anti-vax website and its nonsense has already been completely debunked in the other thread. It serves no further purpose to waste time on it. If you want to be taken seriously then use respected mainstream sources rather than fringe websites.