The catch-all justification for government intrusion... Any policy can be defined nowadays as necessary for national security reasons.
Do you have proof that Bigfoot doesn't exist? Because if you don't, then that obviously means he exists.
Correct combining fiscal insanity with more insanity is insane. Thats the problem with most of socialists. You do not understand the Neo Cons were socialists. Just look up the founders... from wikipedia "New" conservatives initially approached this view from the political left. The forerunners of neoconservatism were most often socialists or sometimes liberals who strongly supported the Allied cause in World War II, and who were influenced by the Great Depression-era ideas of the New Deal, trade unionism, and Trotskyism, particularly those who followed the political ideas of Max Shachtman.[citation needed] A number of future neoconservatives, such as Jeane Kirkpatrick,[citation needed] were Shachtmanites in their youth; some were later involved with Social Democrats USA. George W. combined the worst ideas of both worlds. Fiscal irresponsibility and nation building to protect his dads friends interest in the middle. What the nations needs is smaller government.
On a reduced level the argument would be --- If you state you can prove bigfoot does not exist... then you are a fool. just like atheists.
Oh. So, by default, because you cannot disprove it, you believe in bigfoot as well? How fitting. And what about flying spaghetti monsters? Celestial teapots? We're just getting started.
gab - I can see logic is not your strong suit. I said the conclusion is that he must be talking his book. I did not say he was. Although I am sure I would have no problem finding examples... if he actually released his book. In the past I saw him on t.v. talk about the evils of the eastern block socialism.... and no look at the SOB. Spending a billion on Moveon. To parapharase Mr. Deco... you can't even assume the opposite of what he says is true.
now you are getting it... I dont. and to bring it back to the point of the analogy..... when did any educated believer say that faith - is proof.