Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by truehawk, Dec 18, 2009.
The article seems to suggest that the effect is regional rather than world wide. Which is not to say it's not important.
that's correct. there was a good article in september issue of "Foreign Affairs" with all the problems and advantages connected. e.g.:
* local impact / local solutions
* possibly cheaper to fix
* much faster impact if soot emissions reduced (months as opposed to years for CO2) etc.
Separate names with a comma.