To be fair Doubter, I did reference your quotes in my replies, it should not be difficult to differentiate the relation to each, but I do see where things might be a little ambiguous as far as the psychologist goes. So let me explain myself and spell it out... I responded to your cut & pastings which I am saying are trying to shift emphasis from priests, who are proven to have practised paedophilia, to teachers - who have not. The priests were found out en-mass, teachers were not accused in this manner until the priests were found out , nor has any bona fide claim been made that teachers have committed such crimes in this way. I am saying that the tactics you have so clearly demonstrated, of jumping on dubious statistical reports and so called scientific experiments, are typical of the religious/church mindset, trying to detach itself by attempting an unjustified shifting of emphasis. Unless you wanted to be particularly perverse by misrepresenting my phrase "oh so very respectable child molesting bible teacher christian spiritualist priest psychologists", then it is obvious that your cut& paste stuff, which comes accross in the context of the thread to the point at which you posted it, is a bunch of pretty much meaningless statistical rhetoric. But it results in suggesting that child molesters have an overwhelming chance of being Christian - teacher - priests,... as 70% of Americans say they are Christians and by extension 70% of teachers are Christians and in fact, a whole bunch of priests ARE child molesters!! To my mind it is frivolous to then say, as you do, "human beings do rotten things" when it is predominantly Christian - teacher - priests who do rotten things (according to your own c&p and your latest comments) and this is why I extended it to very respectable child molesting bible teacher christian spiritualist priest psychologists. You could add engine drivers, street cleaners, futures traders to that line, according to your argument ...that was the point I was emphasizing.... It was NOT teachers who have been found out for such crimes against humanity, it was NOT psychologists, it was NOT the general population of human beings. It WAS perverted, sick minded men of God who did those awful things to children. By the way, the scientific psychologist, who examined your aquaintence with his bipolar thingybobs, if he were a true scientist, would not make such bland assumption and generalised comments, or jump to such unrealistic conclusions,.... if he were being true to the scientific method. Assuming of course he was capable of being true to it , and his mindset was not the closed one of a pre suppositionalist religionist!