Socrates Examines Technical Strategy

Discussion in 'Strategy Building' started by Socrates, Dec 27, 2008.

  1. To keep the technicul content flowing, I was surprised that SCT for Reprobates tripped short as late as it did just now. I may have to tweak it. If only I could remember what rule I invoked to overoptimize it yesterday...

    P.S.: times are Pacific because I like to trade in the morning to keep my afternoons free
     
    • s.jpg
      File size:
      29.9 KB
      Views:
      98
    #361     Jan 5, 2009
  2. What Jack failed to explain to the chosen ones was that channel trading is about as probable as coin tossing on a purely technical basis. Note how the 'A' team channel bandwidth is sectioned off into segments, a channel could become a 'super channel'?

    Fanciful to say the least.

    Now, when the 'A' team are buying the 'bottom' line in a bull channel, nobody ever told them that they are buying into a market that was willing to buy at lower prices,....and so the need for extra band/channel width,....you know what the 'A' team are like.

    Of course, they do like thier little EOD picture puzzles.




    Dackster.
     
    #362     Jan 5, 2009
  3. Tara, if you are going to run with the mad dogs, you have to tell us a bit about yourself and how you trade. TMI not necessary. Thanks.
     
    #363     Jan 5, 2009
  4. An interesting analysis, Dack. The only time I draw channels is during the midday retrace when a bear or bull flag forms. IMO that is the only time they are reliable, both for the keeping and the breaking. Also the only time I use Elliot wave.
     
    #364     Jan 5, 2009
  5. nkhoi

    nkhoi

    you could be right on Neo's role but jack is not Morpheus.:p
     
    #365     Jan 5, 2009




  6. Socrates,

    I don't use channels as a 'whole', i may use the bottom line in a bull phase as a visual guage/'handrail', but to be honest....i don't really think they are relevant, but that's IMO.

    I would certainly never rely on the upper line of a channel within a bull phase or vice versa.




    Dackster.
     
    #366     Jan 5, 2009
  7. Sorry, 666, he doesn't like me. Can't understand why. Why don't YOU ask him to look at Emil Kraepelin's balanced interviews and consider it.
     
    #367     Jan 5, 2009
  8. #368     Jan 5, 2009
  9. Here is the update on SCT for Lowlifes. I am embarrassed to post it. Best I'll say for it is that it preserved the AM gains.
     
    • s.jpg
      File size:
      32.5 KB
      Views:
      105
    #369     Jan 5, 2009
  10. Thanks, 666. Re SCT for the B-Team, it wouldn't be much of a book. I had to use three rules to make it as bad as it is. That means it is utterly untestable. But you already knew that, didn't you, hahahaha!
     
    #370     Jan 5, 2009