I must be doing something right and am glad our ideas of "fun" are so different. Speaking of which... I would call you a Canadian limp-dick but that would make your nipples hard.
Because you are, Douchebag Al-Qaeda Sympathizer. Looking at the example of Anwar Al Awlaki, was he tried in a court and found guilty before we murdered him with drones?...We assassinated him, to be precise...and an assassination is a terrorist operation, pure and simple. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...rdered+assassinated+assassination#post3382066 The President swore an oath to defend the Constitution and he ignored that oath when he assassinated Awlaki. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...702&highlight=Awlaki+assassinated#post3385702
That was easy. I am sympathetic to the Constitution and we violated it when we murdered him (Awlaki, not to mention his 16yr old son...who was accused of nothing) extra-judicially. I think most here can see that subtle distinction, yet you pretend you are unable to. Clearly you have an agenda and the Constitution of the United States of America does not figure into it. There are some people here who are interested in discourse. Ricter, as an example, and I, don't always agree, but we are able to converse like adults. I haven't found a way to have that level of discourse with you yet. The good news is your insults have no effect on me so by all means, continue to show everyone that you are nothing but a troll.
Unfortunate with you and 666. But more chilling, will be that this could play out with combat trained citizens. I hope not. I pray not.
You seem more sympathetic to al-Awlaki and his ilk. Take YOUR "blame America" agenda and stick it. And don't even start with your hypocrisy about "conversing like adults," insults and trolling after all the phony labels you tried to put on me and weren't man enough or honorable enough to apologize for.
Saying that he is sympathizer with Al-Qeada is a bit fukked up, doncha think? In effect you are calling him a terrorist, and subject to the laws of the Patriot Act. You need to walk that back, troop.
Please stop pretending to be this dense. I have stated numerous times I care nothing for Awlaki personally. My concern has always been that this extra judicial killing establishes a dangerous precedent whereas the Executive branch now feels perfectly comfortable in assassinating US citizens. I find it very instructive indeed that someone who cried like a 2 year old about being called a chickenhawk now feels perfectly comfortable calling me a terrorist sympathizer (without any proof mind you). And how terrible is your memory...I did apologize for calling you a chickhawk. As for calling you a shill and a troll, you have yet to prove my assertion wrong, and quite a few people here have had the exact same read on you as I have. In fact, you are proving it again, right now. Do you truly not realize this?
If calling the battlefield kill of a prominent member of al-Qaeda an "assassination" and a "terrorist operation" isn't sympathizing with al-Qaeda, what is? What about this: Our foreign policy creates terrorists. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3383346&highlight=terrorism#post3383346 Or this: Also, Awlaki's 16 yr old son was also killed in the drone strike. He was not linked to terrorism in any way shape or form. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3389681&highlight=terrorism#post3389681 Which is bullshit because: Anwar al Awlaki's son hoped 'to attain martyrdom as my father attained it http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2011/12/anwar_al_awlakis_son.php
Hey, I missed all this drama with Ricter. What the hell happened? Ricter, were you about to be banned for something? Can someone give me a quick summary?