advice to you: don't try to be funny when you're not. not "a"ffected at all. just retaliation for months of his psycho behavior. The most pleasing form of revenge is a successful retaliation. Ask President Bush. I am pleased.
Look, don't be upset that I corrected you on affected. So you made a mistake. But that's not to be confused with typing quickly and missing a letter. Geez, you represent echotrade, 'nough said!
You must have a lot of friends...... "lib pricks"??? So let me understand....a person's political beliefs (in your world) determines what kind of person they are over-all? You only respect, admire, hang out with and can be friendly with "non lib pricks"? If your definition, as I understand it, is anything like Maverick's of what a "liberal" is, then in essence, you believe the vast majority of Americans must be "liberals" and therefore "pricks". Keep up your open- mindedness. You are a credit to you very vocal and very small minded minority. And again, as I told Maverick, you are completely non-representative of the true American spirit. peace, RS
PARANOIA SELF DESTROYA! This guy is really a piece of work. Why would anyone want to follow this moron around on this website . . . If the demons get too strong for you, try using the IGNORE BUTTON.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote from Tech Analysis: James - I see you regged in Dec 2003 but remember Inandlong from before ("Hey - Good to see you back again") Might you be one of those with multiple aliases? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, and if environmentalists weren't completely Junk Scienced up we would have nuclear energy to spare, no mercury pollution at all.
Maybe you got your sides mixed up. I don't think that's the case at all. At least for me. I'm a pseudo-enviro-nut and I pray for the day when nuc-a-lar power will take over. The problem is the fossil fuels lobby which, the last time I looked, had a pretty good grip on the white house. Most enviro-nuts out there aren't anti-nuclear power at all. Most sensible people, however, realize that nuc-a-lar power plants need to be placed far enough away from major cities to deter terrorist attacks. But with the exception of that, nuclear power kicks major ass. It hardly pollutes (plus all of the waste is gone within a few hundred years, far quicker than many of today's plastics), the waste, although expensive to store, is pretty low volume compared to the tons of soot and acid that rain down in the skies near a coal plant, is cheaper and easier to deal with than the downstream effects of global warming produced by fossil fuels, BLAH BLAH BLAH. Not to mention higher health costs for fossil fuels. Believe it or not, you could have 5 chernobyls every year and the resulting health costs would still be lower than the health costs incurred as a result of all the illnesses caused by mercury, lead, soot, etc. The deaths from coal/oil/gas aren't as dramatic as those from nuclear waste or accidents. And power plants outside of 3rd world and communist countries are pretty goddamn safe. A little factoid -- there is more energy in the thorium in the earth's crust than all other fossil fuels combined (totally ignoring all the other forms of atomic energy). Put that in your pipe and smoke it. Bottom line -- there is no better power than nuclear power right now. Yeah, you can say "but solar power and windmills and hydro-electric are totally clean and renewable and BLAH BLAH BLAH..." but the reality is that nobody wants fuckin' wind mills everywhere (ever been to Palm Springs?) or solar panels everywhere (ever been to Phoenix?? I gotta admit, the solar panels do look pretty fuckin' kewl, though) and that shit is SO much more expensive per KW than nuc-a-lar right now.