So the Americans cant even sustain another 100K troops in iraq?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by mahram, Dec 2, 2006.

  1. hey dont blame me I was the one telling you guys the war in iraq was a bad idea. But wait you're still thinking the war in iraq is going great right :D....come on admit it. Its just like katrina. When everything was callasping you had the republicans going its a ok :D


    QUOTE]Quote from trader88:

    Only a complete idiot would think that mahram is not a complete idiot. [/QUOTE]
     
    #11     Dec 3, 2006
  2. [/QUOTE]

    Refer to dddooo's reply to you on this thread.
    Again, only a complete idiot would think that mahram is not a complete idiot.
     
    #12     Dec 3, 2006
  3. But you see that's what war is. War is to KILL all the guys on the other side. Not to surgically carve out a person from between stuff. War means make the other PEOPLE quit because the consequences are too drastic.

    I honestly believe that that is what's missing in all this sanitized war crap. Think about it, World War II only ended because the Japanese people wanted to kill the Emperor. You know, after the horrible American bombs fell killing all those innocent people. They (the people) stopped the war, not the bombs!

    It took draconian measures to stop the war. I would have had no trouble waking one morning listening to the horrible details of how we took out Baghdad and Saddam and the new peoples representative government was now seeking peace. After all, the President of Iraq declared war for and on behalf of his country...

    I wouldn't bomb them into the stone age. That is the metaphoric rhetoric that we need to stop subscribing to. Call it what it is, a nasty one way ticket for one side. The real trouble is that we never try to win, we try to fight with Marcus of Queensbury rules. We wouldn't want to accidently kill people who want to kill us and don't understand that we're really nice. We just need to dialog with them and share our money, and food, and technology, and our successes, and then they'd change their minds. Yea, that's right, we can buy them and their friendship.

    Heaven help that we'd be viewed as a combatant with an unfair advantage if we actually fought for real. You know, technology and manpower that overwhelmed the smaller unfriendly warrior.

    Think about this. Say we took them at their word when they declared war. Imagine how they would feel if they woke that morning to find that ALL of their military bases were now giant holes in the ground. After all, it is war. And that would be a simple task with today's technology. The killing of the military would be expected in war by both sides, wouldn't it? You know, that just might be a viable way to win a war!

    Purpose? Simple! He defied United Nations resolutions and we got tired of it. I'd have had no trouble with the whole thing had it been presented that way. And we could have said that as an example to all who would doubt the commitment of the United States support against the violations of United Nations sanctions, we are now acting on our own. That's what we were accused of so fine, let's be about the business of the business.

    One war, executed properly, would quickly show the world what a real war is and why they don't need to happen. I'm sure this country was looked on as bad for the nukes in Japan. And we survived all those nay-sayers then too. :)
     
    #13     Dec 4, 2006
  4. No, It isn't. But South Central could be cleaned up if you said gang banging ACTIVITIES received mandatory sentencing of five years, and meant it. The majority of my community would welcome such moves. You see, we don't like crime either. And that would no longer viably allow for glorification of the gang life on video and CD. It would also allow me, an African American tax-paying, hard working, role model to be a supported voice of reason for the youth.

    I could honestly tell them that crime doesn't pay, and they could see it! Because right now, crime seems to pay really good. The message they get is that if they could stab, rob, and lightly kill, they too could be big in the entertainment world and get a dope music deal just like Snoop, Jay-Z, Tupoc, Biggie and G-Unit. Then they too can cop a spot and be on MTV Cribs, and have all the hoes and the clothes, and a dope azz whip, and two big screen TV's, and... :)
     
    #14     Dec 4, 2006
  5. are you crazy??? united nations resolution? LOL LOL LOL.. i just spewed dr pepper all over my screen. true conservatives abhor the united nations and their socialist agendas. but if you like i can play this game. we bombed iraq into the stone age because they defied the UN sanctions? yet we let other countries defy these same sanctions 100 fold? is that fair or selective prosecution?

    the stated reason for the illegal invasion was the immediate threat posed by saddams wmd's. that was a lie then and now... the wmd's he had we supplied in the 80's when he was our puppet. google "april glaspie"... google hill and knowltin and babies, and incubators and fake evidence and fake russian satellite photos. from the beginning of the first war there has been nothing but deception from the republicans regarding saddam. the day george zapata bush the first illegally invaded iraq i ceased being a republican. they serve a different master and it is not the american citizens. the media is complicit and people like you that don't do your homework are to blame for this mess continuing. wake up people... this shit is getting thick. i almost think it is too late.
     
    #15     Dec 4, 2006
  6. why didnt you take out North Korea, afraid their big brother china, would take it harshly that you nuked their ally. You have to admit chinas the only country around the world that americans bow down to, when they say no, americans run away.


     
    #16     Dec 4, 2006

  7. For those who might have spent their childhood in the caves of upper himalayas, and consequently had a severely limited access to any kind of modern media, not all gangs are composed of black people. We have Mexican, Asian, and white gangs as well. :D :D :D
     
    #17     Dec 4, 2006
  8. Hhehe, but its america right, its more politically correct to shoot black people :D


     
    #18     Dec 5, 2006
  9. CM, I agree with almost everything you write here. However, the above has thrown me for a loop.

    The Japanese people wanted to kill the Emperor?!?

    I hadn't heard that one before. Please elaborate!!
     
    #19     Dec 5, 2006

  10. They hated his new clothes.:p :p :p
     
    #20     Dec 5, 2006